The improvement in functional capacity, as evaluated by the distance walked on the ISWT, was significantly greater in the
experimental group than in the control group (MD 130 m, 95% CI 77 to 182). When calculated as a standardised effect size, the between-group difference equated to a Cohen’s d of 1.39. No significant between-group differences occurred in the variables monitored during the ISWT: heart rate, percentage of predicted maximal heart rate, SpO2 and Borg dyspnoea and fatigue scales (data not shown). The SpO2 during the aerobic training did not show any desaturation < 84%, as outlined in the Methods section.
The improvement in functional capacity, as evaluated by the distance walked on the ISWT, was significantly greater in theexperimental group than in the control group (MD 130 m, 95% CI 77 to 182). When calculated as a standardised effect size, the between-group difference equated to a Cohen’s d of 1.39. No significant between-group differences occurred in the variables monitored during the ISWT: heart rate, percentage of predicted maximal heart rate, SpO2 and Borg dyspnoea and fatigue scales (data not shown). The SpO2 during the aerobic training did not show any desaturation < 84%, as outlined in the Methods section.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
![](//thimg.ilovetranslation.com/pic/loading_3.gif?v=b9814dd30c1d7c59_8619)