Table 3
Growth performances and feed utilization efficiencies in Labeo rohita fingerlings fed experimental diets for 80 days. Data are mean value ± SE, (n = 3).
Parameters
Initial wt (g) Final wt (g) BMGa (%) Feed intakeb SGR (% day−1) FCR
PER ANPU (%)
RD
3.22 ± 0.04 6.28d ± 0.08 95.6de ± 3.21 1.9a ± 0.09 0.84de ± 0.04 2.45b ± 0.09 1.1f ± 0.06 20.1g ± 0.63
Diets with raw GOC
Diets with GOC fermented with P. kudriavzevi
R1
3.28 ± 0.06
5.62c ± 0.09 71.3c ± 2.68 1.94ab ± 0.06 0.68c ± 0.03 3.05d ± 0.13 0.89d ± 0.05 15.3d ± 0.48
R2
3.3 ± 0.07
5.28b ± 0.06 60b ± 2.23 1.98ab ± 0.12 0.59b ± 0.4 3.52e ± 0.16 0.75c ± 0.03 12.9c ± 0.36
R3
3.32 ± 0.07
5.1ab ± 0.07 53.6a ± 1.95 2.01b ± 0.11 0.54a ± 0.02 3.85f ± 0.15 0.69b ± 0.04 11.9b ± 0.38
R4
3.26 ± 0.05
4.98a ± 0.08 52.7a ± 1.88 2.29c ± 0.14 0.54a ± 0.03 4.05g ± 0.19 0.65a ± 0.02 10.2a ± 0.29
F1
3.18 ± 0.04
6.18d ± 0.07 94.3d ± 1.96 1.99a ± 0.09 0.83de ± 0.02 2.51b ± 0.08 1.08f ± 0.05 18.9f ± 0.33
F2
3.32 ± 0.07
6.62e ± 0.06 99.4e ± 2.58 1.95a ± 0.08 0.86e ± 0.03 2.39b ± 0.07 1.11f ± 0.07 21.1g ± 0.53
F3
3.24 ± 0.05
7.08f ± 0.06 118.5f ± 3.21 2.01b ± 0.08 0.98f ± 0.04 2.18a ± 0.08 1.25g ± 0.09 23.2h ± 0.55
F4
3.28 ± 0.07
6.3d ± 0.07 92.07d ± 2.31 2.03b ± 0.11 0.81d ± 0.02 2.67c ± 0.09 0.99e ± 0.04 16.8e ± 0.42
Mean value with same superscripts in the same row were not significantly different (P< 0.05)
a Body Mass Gain.
b g 100 g−1 body weight of fish day−1 .
Table 4
Apparent digestibility of dry matter and nutrients in Labeo rohita fingerlings fed experimental diets for 80 days. Data are mean value ± SE (n = 3)
Parameters
Dry matter Protein Lipid
RD
63.03c ± 0.51 83.03cde ± 0.96 90.28ab ± 1.06
Diets with raw GOC
Diets with GOC fermented with P. kudriavzevi
F1 F2 F3 F4
R1
58.99b ± 0.39
79.0bc ± 0.84 89.12ab ± 0.96
R2 R3 R4
56.74b ± 0.31 77.72b ± 0.78 88.61ab ± 0.78
52.94a ± 0.18 72.99a ± 0.68 87.5ab ± 0.91
50.54a ± 0.28 71.0a ± 0.58 86.18a ± 0.83
62.45cd ± 0.48 80.99bcd ± 0.73 89.58a ± 0.79
63.46d ± 0.58 84.1de ± 0.91 90.61b ± 1.12
64.91d ± 0.55 85.8e ± 0.85 91.5b ± 1.26
64.57d ± 0.42 82.3c ± 0.79 90.28ab ± 0.92
Mean value with same superscripts in the same row
were not significantly different (P < 0.05).