levels on carcass meat. However, that was not the case, as no significant difference was found between shots in the
abdomen and elsewhere within the same hunting day and when comparing the levels of TVC or EBC (Table 2),
contrary to another study 3. This leads to the conclusion that “poor shooting” did not account for the high level of
microbial contamination of carcass meat; even the animals shot in the right anatomical location had high levels of
microbial contamination. On the other hand, TVC and EBC on carcass meat were notably higher than those on the skin, implying that skin had little impact on meat contamination during dressing carcasses (Table 1). The
contamination from the skin and/or from the rupturing of digestive tract are the main sources for carcass meat
microbial contamination, but we found no evidence that this occurred in our study. Therefore, we conclude that
workers’ handling and dressing practice might have had an influence on the high level of carcass meat
contamination.
levels on carcass meat. However, that was not the case, as no significant difference was found between shots in theabdomen and elsewhere within the same hunting day and when comparing the levels of TVC or EBC (Table 2),contrary to another study 3. This leads to the conclusion that “poor shooting” did not account for the high level ofmicrobial contamination of carcass meat; even the animals shot in the right anatomical location had high levels ofmicrobial contamination. On the other hand, TVC and EBC on carcass meat were notably higher than those on the skin, implying that skin had little impact on meat contamination during dressing carcasses (Table 1). Thecontamination from the skin and/or from the rupturing of digestive tract are the main sources for carcass meatmicrobial contamination, but we found no evidence that this occurred in our study. Therefore, we conclude thatworkers’ handling and dressing practice might have had an influence on the high level of carcass meatcontamination.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..