But what is related to our discussion here is that if ASEAN citizenship is to be taken seriously as to its legal meaning and enforcement, it means a status of citizenship recognized by agreements among the ten member nations. This is most relevant to the case of stateless people. There are a number of stateless people in Thailand and some other ASEAN nations. Statistic regarding this matter needs to be examined. These stateless people will need to have an identification card and a legal status. It is inhumane for human beings to have no place to stand and to live on this planet which was created, as theists believe, by God. It is pathetic that these people are pushed around by countries that barred them from entering the country because they did not have citizenship. The Rohingya is a case in point. They were not accepted by Bangladesh and were discriminated in Myanmar while not allowed into enter the country by Thailand and some other countries. Strongly arguably these people are fellow human beings and they have a right to live on this planet Earth. Some type of legal status and identity should thus be provided them. And in the case of ASEAN, they could be considered to be granted ASEAN citizenship. But this has to be agreed upon by all the member nations. It has to be a concerted effort with the sanction and probably support of the U.N. The advantage they would have is they can travel and live in any ASEAN country of their choice and enjoy, some rights granted by the host country. The thing is this is a big issue and it will need serious discussions among the member countries to work out a solution. The big question is whether this line of thoughts and proposal will be acceptable by ASEAN.