3.2. Accuracy of the method
To evaluate the accuracy of the method, the sample recovery percentage(%R) values were calculated. The%R valuesand FA were established from the complete analysis (intriplicate) of 6 samples spik with 3 levels of FA standards (STD). In Table 2 mean values of %R are presented. Asobservedin Table 2, the%R values ranged between 83% and 108%. The %R values were slightly higher for C12:0, C15:0, C16:0, and C18:0. The highest variation in the %R values were observed in the STD 150% than in STD 50%, probably because this STD contained the lowest percentage of FA. There covery percentages in this study were approaching 100% which indicates the appropriateness of the proposed method in terms of quality control to analyze amixture of FA
3.2. Accuracy of the methodTo evaluate the accuracy of the method, the sample recovery percentage(%R) values were calculated. The%R valuesand FA were established from the complete analysis (intriplicate) of 6 samples spik with 3 levels of FA standards (STD). In Table 2 mean values of %R are presented. Asobservedin Table 2, the%R values ranged between 83% and 108%. The %R values were slightly higher for C12:0, C15:0, C16:0, and C18:0. The highest variation in the %R values were observed in the STD 150% than in STD 50%, probably because this STD contained the lowest percentage of FA. There covery percentages in this study were approaching 100% which indicates the appropriateness of the proposed method in terms of quality control to analyze amixture of FA
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..