At the same time the military has been criticized for promoting its own interests and those of its leaders . for instance with almost no debate the military’s hand-picked assembly has increased the 2007 defense budget by some 50 percent the junta has purged the public service and has military officers into significant positions in administration A number of scandals have emerged as military leaders have been placed in lucrative positions in various state enterprises and have taken advantage of special privileges and state funds for dubious spending projects .
Despite these problems for the moment this conservative turn appears to be supported by the bangkok-dominated middle class. A common middle-class refrain has been that the people who supported Thaksin-mainly the working class and especially poor rural population –were ignorant, bewildered, bought off, or coerced. These positions permit arguments that the dispossessed, the working class, and rural people are not ready for democracy or might act against the interests of full democratic transition in Thailand. This easily creates a case for a hybrid regime where a semi-democracy could be re-established-that is, a “Thai-style democracy” that emphasizes a conservative political agenda involving royalism , traditionalism, nationalism, and paternalism.
At the same time, it is unlikely that the conservatives can get all that they want. For example, the junta claimed that they could do better than Thaksin in solving the southern insurgency. Ominously of the separatist struggle in the south has increased, and the government has reverted to handed actions. The south is just one of the facing the current regime.
At the same time the military has been criticized for promoting its own interests and those of its leaders . for instance with almost no debate the military’s hand-picked assembly has increased the 2007 defense budget by some 50 percent the junta has purged the public service and has military officers into significant positions in administration A number of scandals have emerged as military leaders have been placed in lucrative positions in various state enterprises and have taken advantage of special privileges and state funds for dubious spending projects .Despite these problems for the moment this conservative turn appears to be supported by the bangkok-dominated middle class. A common middle-class refrain has been that the people who supported Thaksin-mainly the working class and especially poor rural population –were ignorant, bewildered, bought off, or coerced. These positions permit arguments that the dispossessed, the working class, and rural people are not ready for democracy or might act against the interests of full democratic transition in Thailand. This easily creates a case for a hybrid regime where a semi-democracy could be re-established-that is, a “Thai-style democracy” that emphasizes a conservative political agenda involving royalism , traditionalism, nationalism, and paternalism.ในเวลาเดียวกัน ก็ไม่น่าที่พรรคอนุรักษ์นิยมจะได้รับทั้งหมดที่พวกเขาต้องการ ตัวอย่างเช่น junta ที่อ้างว่า พวกเขาสามารถทำได้ดีกว่าทักษิณในการแก้ปัญหาภาคใต้ Ominously ของการแบ่งแยกต่อสู้ในภาคใต้ได้เพิ่มขึ้น และรัฐบาลมีแปลงกลับการดำเนินการมอบ ภาคใต้เป็นเพียงหนึ่งหันหน้าไปทางระบอบการปกครองปัจจุบัน
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..