Yet, other studies of gender differences in leadership effectiveness are conducted in laboratory settings. These types of studies often involve a group of undergraduate students working together on a task, while being “led” by their group’s student leader (e.g., Eskilson, 1975; Jacobson & Effertz, 1974; York, 2005). The group members are typically focused on the task at hand and thus may have few distractions when they assess the leaders’ effectiveness. Given the reduced cognitive load of participants in laboratory settings compared to those in organizational settings, these individuals may be less likely to rely upon think manager–think male stereotypes and biases in making judgments of leadership effectiveness.
Yet, other studies of gender differences in leadership effectiveness are conducted in laboratory settings. These types of studies often involve a group of undergraduate students working together on a task, while being “led” by their group’s student leader (e.g., Eskilson, 1975; Jacobson & Effertz, 1974; York, 2005). The group members are typically focused on the task at hand and thus may have few distractions when they assess the leaders’ effectiveness. Given the reduced cognitive load of participants in laboratory settings compared to those in organizational settings, these individuals may be less likely to rely upon think manager–think male stereotypes and biases in making judgments of leadership effectiveness.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..