about homeopathy will in due time be fully uncovered, and, unleashed, medical science will
finally be able to continue its march forward without the skeptics’ spokes in its wheels. During
the time of Hahnemann literally hundreds of books and pamphlets and even a journal34 and an
anti-Organon35 were published by skeptics. Despite these intensive campaigns of denigration,
homeopathy has continued its march forward, slowly but surely. What is true and good will
remain true and good, despite what well-known communicators and supposedly men of science
write against it. It is interesting to note how unwavering is the skeptics’ stance despite mounts of
evidence. This phenomenon seems to not be so uncommon in science as Max Planck once
remarked, “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them
see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up
that is familiar with it.” Hahnemann in its turn remarked that it is impossible without virtue to be a
true man of science.