Higher porosity (as in samples prepared with 300% printing width)
as well as lower interfilament and interlayer interactions do not lead
to a higher degradation rate after one actuation cycle compared to samples
prepared with 100 and 200% printing width. Indeed, the difference
between samples prepared with 100%, 200% and 300% printing width
and compressed samples is explained by the lower bending actuation
and thus lower strain of the compressed biocomposite samples (Fig. 8a).