In spite of the recognized need for internationalization of business school curricula, very few business schools have actually internationalized their curricula for nearly two decades (Kedia & Cornwell, 1994, Fugate & Jefferson, 1994). Francis & Globerman (1992/3) identified, in their textbook survey, that there was no textbook written from a truly global perspective. White and Griffith (1998) also found that business schools have internationalized their curricula to only a small extent and course contents have not yet internationalized.
Researchers have suggested numerous ways to internationalize business curricula. Bonarparte (1989) suggested the following approach: (1) requiring international modules within core courses, or (2) requiring an international business course. Goldberg (1992/3) recommended adding international modules to existing courses, particularly introductory courses in functional areas. Ahmed and Krohn (1994) proposed integrating international topics into existing business courses, such as marketing or finance. Kwok and Arpan (1994) recommended the infusion approach, which involves the insertion of the international dimension of business into existing business courses. In their survey, Kwok and Arpan (1994) found that 74 percent of respondent business schools used infusion at both undergraduate and