Table 7
Optimised formulation and their predicted responses based on constraints applied to
significant dependent variables.
Variables Formulation 1 Formulation 2
Independent
A: Fat 4.2 0.0
B: Orafti GR 7.3 8.3
C: Orafti HP 7.3 10.4
Total (A + B + C) 18.7 18.7
Dependent
Fat (%) 5.9 2.2
Fructan (g 100 g−1 DW) 25.7 32.8
Cook loss (%) 3.9 3.0
TEF (%) 6.2 4.1
Hardness (N) 83.0 101.4
Chewiness (J) 235.9 258.8
Gumminess (N) 26.6 31.2
Springiness (mm) 8.1 7.8
L* 66.4 65.7
b* 16.8 16.4
aColour 3.7 3.6
Tenderness 5.4 4.9
Mouthfeel 4.8 4.3
Juiciness 4.9 4.3
Saltiness 4.8 4.5
Sweetness 3.5 4.5
Greasiness 4.8 4.4
Overall acceptability 4.5 4.1
Desirability 0.60 0.54
a Sensory attributes were evaluated by means of ten point line scales (0 = pale/very
hard/coarse/dry/not salty/not sweet/non-fat/dislike; 10 = dark/very tender/smooth/
moist/very salty/very sweet/extremely fat/like).