derive the peak-to-mean ratios, is shown in Fig. 8. For an exceedenceprobability of 3% (Fig. 8a), the range of separation distancesdetermined by LASAT is again larger than for AODM; with theformer, up to 500 m occur, with the latter, only up to 400 m. Again,also the two branches of separation distances show up, but not asdistinct as in Fig. 6. Up to about 150e200m, AODM calculates largerseparation distances than LASAT. This occurs mostly with N to NEwind and SW wind. The average separation distance determined byLASAT is now larger, namely 248 m, compared to 212mwith AODM(Table 6). r2 is 0.96; this underlines the high correlation of separationdistances.
Looking at the comparison for 8% exceedence probability(Fig. 8b), maximum separation distances are again larger whendetermined with LASAT, but the differences are reduced comparedto 3% (about 330 m compared to 280 m with AODM). Only from200 m onwards, LASAT calculates larger separation distances thanAODM. The average separation distance for LASAT is only 147 m,
compared to 172 mwith AODM (Table 6). r2 is 0.99. The increase of