- ข้อความ
- ประวัติศาสตร์
ConclusionThe importance of individ
Conclusion
The importance of individual “nature encounter” and “nature
experiences” is often cited in calls for increasing levels of individual
environmental concern as a remedy to environmental degradation.
Lately, this idea has found scholarly application in the perspective
of environmental connectedness and related studies looking for
possible pro-environmental behavior as outcomes of “nature
encounter.” The study presented in this article uses nature based
outdoor recreation as the general context to explore behavior
outcomes from nature experience. However, the study fails to
present a strong relationship between the measures of environmental
connectedness and environmental behavior. Results indicate
that connectedness does not automatically imply a
commitment to engage in the specific behaviors noted. This lack of
solidity is consistent with results presented in earlier research.
Urged by this, our article moves on to examine the environmental
connectedness perspective on a basis of perspectives
derived from the wider human geographical discussion regarding
the humaneenvironmental relationship. The examination reveals
that the construct of environmental connectedness is rooted in a
material/objective perspective, neglecting the human domain of
perceptions, values, and representations. The environment is portrayed
as a geographically undefined agent, “nature”, with the
inherent power to change human attitudes and behavior. Thus, the
environmental connectedness perspective bears resemblance to
environmental determinism, a set of ideas that is widely contested
within contemporary human geography.
This article argues that the environmental connectedness
perspective may suffer from dualistic thinking and a reliance on
simple causality. While this is also the case for most mainstream
geographical thought on the humaneenvironment relationship,
there are various disciplinary approaches that attempt to move on
from the unilateral relationship of dominance apparent in all
dualist thinking. In accordance with these, we suggest that the
nebulous category of nature should be replaced with the relational
concept of place. In fact, it can be stated with certainty that “nature
encounter” always takes place somewhere, remembering that the
previously noted environmental luminaries Henry David Thoreau,
John Muir, and Aldo Leopold grounded their thoughts and writings
in the experience of particular places: i.e. long term experiences in
and attachment to Walden, Yosemite, and the farm in Wisconsin's
Sand County.
Humanistic geographer Yi-Fu Tuan refers in his book, Topophilia:
a study of environmental perception (1974), to the significance of the
affective place-based bond between people and the environment.
Yet, to assume pro-environmental behavioral change as a necessary
outcome of spending time at particular places is to once again
relapse into simplicity and reductionism. Understanding reasons
for human behavior change calls for a much greater consideration
of covariance and complexity. This complexity goes beyond plain
progression models and their inherent pursuit for universality and
necessity, and refers to environmental concern as a phenomenon
occurring within the relations between individuals and their
various interacting contexts. One of these contexts, and the context
of the data from this research, may be that of outdoor recreation.
Though “nature encounter” is likely to fail as a general prescription
for pro-environmental change, regardless the suitability of any
particular location, there are still reasons to believe that recreational
settings, places, may facilitate and frame interpersonal relationships,
social formation, and behavior.
For further research we concur with the recommendation of
Müller et al. (2009) and promote their suggestion for more elaborate
developmental studies. We encourage a broadened methodological
approach as well, especially various qualitative methods.
Deliberate investigation of lived experience, i.e. stories of place
affiliation, may be able to provide better understanding into the
conditions and context necessary for motivation of proenvironmental
behavior. Qualitative inquiry may also offer insight
into how place can be more specifically operationalized for application
within future quantitative efforts.
Ultimately, we recommend conceptualizing not one pathway
from “nature” experience to environmental behavior, but many
paths of interplay between places of human affiliation and proenvironmental
behavior.
The importance of individual “nature encounter” and “nature
experiences” is often cited in calls for increasing levels of individual
environmental concern as a remedy to environmental degradation.
Lately, this idea has found scholarly application in the perspective
of environmental connectedness and related studies looking for
possible pro-environmental behavior as outcomes of “nature
encounter.” The study presented in this article uses nature based
outdoor recreation as the general context to explore behavior
outcomes from nature experience. However, the study fails to
present a strong relationship between the measures of environmental
connectedness and environmental behavior. Results indicate
that connectedness does not automatically imply a
commitment to engage in the specific behaviors noted. This lack of
solidity is consistent with results presented in earlier research.
Urged by this, our article moves on to examine the environmental
connectedness perspective on a basis of perspectives
derived from the wider human geographical discussion regarding
the humaneenvironmental relationship. The examination reveals
that the construct of environmental connectedness is rooted in a
material/objective perspective, neglecting the human domain of
perceptions, values, and representations. The environment is portrayed
as a geographically undefined agent, “nature”, with the
inherent power to change human attitudes and behavior. Thus, the
environmental connectedness perspective bears resemblance to
environmental determinism, a set of ideas that is widely contested
within contemporary human geography.
This article argues that the environmental connectedness
perspective may suffer from dualistic thinking and a reliance on
simple causality. While this is also the case for most mainstream
geographical thought on the humaneenvironment relationship,
there are various disciplinary approaches that attempt to move on
from the unilateral relationship of dominance apparent in all
dualist thinking. In accordance with these, we suggest that the
nebulous category of nature should be replaced with the relational
concept of place. In fact, it can be stated with certainty that “nature
encounter” always takes place somewhere, remembering that the
previously noted environmental luminaries Henry David Thoreau,
John Muir, and Aldo Leopold grounded their thoughts and writings
in the experience of particular places: i.e. long term experiences in
and attachment to Walden, Yosemite, and the farm in Wisconsin's
Sand County.
Humanistic geographer Yi-Fu Tuan refers in his book, Topophilia:
a study of environmental perception (1974), to the significance of the
affective place-based bond between people and the environment.
Yet, to assume pro-environmental behavioral change as a necessary
outcome of spending time at particular places is to once again
relapse into simplicity and reductionism. Understanding reasons
for human behavior change calls for a much greater consideration
of covariance and complexity. This complexity goes beyond plain
progression models and their inherent pursuit for universality and
necessity, and refers to environmental concern as a phenomenon
occurring within the relations between individuals and their
various interacting contexts. One of these contexts, and the context
of the data from this research, may be that of outdoor recreation.
Though “nature encounter” is likely to fail as a general prescription
for pro-environmental change, regardless the suitability of any
particular location, there are still reasons to believe that recreational
settings, places, may facilitate and frame interpersonal relationships,
social formation, and behavior.
For further research we concur with the recommendation of
Müller et al. (2009) and promote their suggestion for more elaborate
developmental studies. We encourage a broadened methodological
approach as well, especially various qualitative methods.
Deliberate investigation of lived experience, i.e. stories of place
affiliation, may be able to provide better understanding into the
conditions and context necessary for motivation of proenvironmental
behavior. Qualitative inquiry may also offer insight
into how place can be more specifically operationalized for application
within future quantitative efforts.
Ultimately, we recommend conceptualizing not one pathway
from “nature” experience to environmental behavior, but many
paths of interplay between places of human affiliation and proenvironmental
behavior.
0/5000
บทสรุปความสำคัญของบุคคล "ธรรมชาติพบ" และ "ธรรมชาติมักจะอ้างถึงประสบการณ์"ในการเรียกสำหรับการเพิ่มระดับของแต่ละบุคคลปัญหาสิ่งแวดล้อมเป็นการแก้เพื่อสร้างสิ่งแวดล้อมเมื่อเร็ว ๆ นี้ ความคิดนี้ได้พบโปรแกรมประยุกต์ scholarly ในมุมมองconnectedness สิ่งแวดล้อมและที่เกี่ยวข้องศึกษาหาพฤติกรรมสิ่งแวดล้อมโปได้เป็นผลของ "ธรรมชาติพบกัน" การศึกษาที่นำเสนอในบทความนี้ใช้ตามธรรมชาติสันทนาการกลางแจ้งเป็นบริบททั่วไปการสำรวจพฤติกรรมผลที่ได้จากธรรมชาติ อย่างไรก็ตาม การศึกษาล้มเหลวในการนำเสนอความสัมพันธ์ที่ดีระหว่างมาตรการของสิ่งแวดล้อมconnectedness และลักษณะสิ่งแวดล้อม ระบุผลลัพธ์connectedness นั้นได้โดยอัตโนมัติเป็นการมั่นในพฤติกรรมระบุไว้ การขาดความแข็งแรงสอดคล้องกับผลการนำเสนองานวิจัยก่อนหน้านี้ได้เรียกร้องให้ตาม บทความของเราไปในตรวจการสิ่งแวดล้อมconnectedness มุมมองบนพื้นฐานของมุมมองจากการสนทนาทางภูมิศาสตร์กว้างมนุษย์เกี่ยวกับความสัมพันธ์ humaneenvironmental แสดงถึงการตรวจสอบที่โครงสร้างของ connectedness สิ่งแวดล้อมจะใช้ในการมุมมองของวัสดุ/วัตถุประสงค์ neglecting โดเมนของมนุษย์ภาพลักษณ์ ค่า และนำเสนอ เซ็กส์สิ่งแวดล้อมเป็นตัวแทนไม่ได้กำหนดกันทางภูมิศาสตร์ "ธรรมชาติ" กับการพลังงานโดยธรรมชาติการเปลี่ยนแปลงพฤติกรรมและทัศนคติของมนุษย์ ดังนั้น การมุมมองด้านสิ่งแวดล้อม connectedness หมีรูปสิ่งแวดล้อม determinism ชุดของความคิดที่แพร่หลายจากทั้งหมดในภูมิศาสตร์มนุษย์ร่วมสมัยบทความนี้จนที่ connectedness สิ่งแวดล้อมมุมมองอาจทรมานจาก dualistic คิดและมีความเชื่อมั่นในcausality ง่าย ขณะนี้มีกรณีกับส่วนใหญ่ความคิดทางภูมิศาสตร์สัมพันธ์ humaneenvironmentมีวิธีการวินัยต่าง ๆ ที่พยายามจะไปจากความสัมพันธ์ของการครอบงำที่ชัดเจนในทุกฝ่ายdualist คิด ตามนี้ เราขอแนะนำที่ประเภท nebulous ของธรรมชาติควรถูกแทนที่ ด้วยที่เกี่ยวข้องแนวคิดของสถานที่ ในความเป็นจริง สามารถระบุ ด้วยแน่นอนว่าธรรมชาติ"พบ"เสมอเกิดขึ้นที่ใดที่หนึ่ง จำที่สังเกตสิ่งแวดล้อม luminaries Henry David ทอโร ก่อนหน้านี้จอห์น Muir และลีโอพอล์ด Aldo สูตรความคิดและงานเขียนของพวกเขาในประสบการณ์ของสถานเฉพาะ: ประสบการณ์เช่นระยะยาวในจะวอลเดน โยเซมิตี และฟาร์มในของวิสคอนซินทรายเขตการชนิด humanistic ทวนฟูยีอ้างในหนังสือของเขา Topophilia:การศึกษาการรับรู้สิ่งแวดล้อม (1974), สำคัญผลที่ตามพันธะระหว่างคนและสิ่งแวดล้อมยัง คิดเปลี่ยนพฤติกรรมสิ่งแวดล้อมมืออาชีพจำเป็นผลของการใช้เวลาในสถานเฉพาะเป็นการอีกครั้งกลับไปเสพเป็นความเรียบง่ายและ reductionism เข้าใจเหตุผลfor human behavior change calls for a much greater considerationof covariance and complexity. This complexity goes beyond plainprogression models and their inherent pursuit for universality andnecessity, and refers to environmental concern as a phenomenonoccurring within the relations between individuals and theirvarious interacting contexts. One of these contexts, and the contextof the data from this research, may be that of outdoor recreation.Though “nature encounter” is likely to fail as a general prescriptionfor pro-environmental change, regardless the suitability of anyparticular location, there are still reasons to believe that recreationalsettings, places, may facilitate and frame interpersonal relationships,social formation, and behavior.For further research we concur with the recommendation ofMüller et al. (2009) and promote their suggestion for more elaboratedevelopmental studies. We encourage a broadened methodologicalapproach as well, especially various qualitative methods.Deliberate investigation of lived experience, i.e. stories of placeaffiliation, may be able to provide better understanding into theconditions and context necessary for motivation of proenvironmentalbehavior. Qualitative inquiry may also offer insightinto how place can be more specifically operationalized for applicationwithin future quantitative efforts.Ultimately, we recommend conceptualizing not one pathwayจากประสบการณ์ทำงานด้านสิ่งแวดล้อม แต่หลาย "ธรรมชาติ"เส้นทางของล้อระหว่างสถานมนุษย์สังกัด proenvironmentalลักษณะการทำงาน
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
Conclusion
The importance of individual “nature encounter” and “nature
experiences” is often cited in calls for increasing levels of individual
environmental concern as a remedy to environmental degradation.
Lately, this idea has found scholarly application in the perspective
of environmental connectedness and related studies looking for
possible pro-environmental behavior as outcomes of “nature
encounter.” The study presented in this article uses nature based
outdoor recreation as the general context to explore behavior
outcomes from nature experience. However, the study fails to
present a strong relationship between the measures of environmental
connectedness and environmental behavior. Results indicate
that connectedness does not automatically imply a
commitment to engage in the specific behaviors noted. This lack of
solidity is consistent with results presented in earlier research.
Urged by this, our article moves on to examine the environmental
connectedness perspective on a basis of perspectives
derived from the wider human geographical discussion regarding
the humaneenvironmental relationship. The examination reveals
that the construct of environmental connectedness is rooted in a
material/objective perspective, neglecting the human domain of
perceptions, values, and representations. The environment is portrayed
as a geographically undefined agent, “nature”, with the
inherent power to change human attitudes and behavior. Thus, the
environmental connectedness perspective bears resemblance to
environmental determinism, a set of ideas that is widely contested
within contemporary human geography.
This article argues that the environmental connectedness
perspective may suffer from dualistic thinking and a reliance on
simple causality. While this is also the case for most mainstream
geographical thought on the humaneenvironment relationship,
there are various disciplinary approaches that attempt to move on
from the unilateral relationship of dominance apparent in all
dualist thinking. In accordance with these, we suggest that the
nebulous category of nature should be replaced with the relational
concept of place. In fact, it can be stated with certainty that “nature
encounter” always takes place somewhere, remembering that the
previously noted environmental luminaries Henry David Thoreau,
John Muir, and Aldo Leopold grounded their thoughts and writings
in the experience of particular places: i.e. long term experiences in
and attachment to Walden, Yosemite, and the farm in Wisconsin's
Sand County.
Humanistic geographer Yi-Fu Tuan refers in his book, Topophilia:
a study of environmental perception (1974), to the significance of the
affective place-based bond between people and the environment.
Yet, to assume pro-environmental behavioral change as a necessary
outcome of spending time at particular places is to once again
relapse into simplicity and reductionism. Understanding reasons
for human behavior change calls for a much greater consideration
of covariance and complexity. This complexity goes beyond plain
progression models and their inherent pursuit for universality and
necessity, and refers to environmental concern as a phenomenon
occurring within the relations between individuals and their
various interacting contexts. One of these contexts, and the context
of the data from this research, may be that of outdoor recreation.
Though “nature encounter” is likely to fail as a general prescription
for pro-environmental change, regardless the suitability of any
particular location, there are still reasons to believe that recreational
settings, places, may facilitate and frame interpersonal relationships,
social formation, and behavior.
For further research we concur with the recommendation of
Müller et al. (2009) and promote their suggestion for more elaborate
developmental studies. We encourage a broadened methodological
approach as well, especially various qualitative methods.
Deliberate investigation of lived experience, i.e. stories of place
affiliation, may be able to provide better understanding into the
conditions and context necessary for motivation of proenvironmental
behavior. Qualitative inquiry may also offer insight
into how place can be more specifically operationalized for application
within future quantitative efforts.
Ultimately, we recommend conceptualizing not one pathway
from “nature” experience to environmental behavior, but many
paths of interplay between places of human affiliation and proenvironmental
behavior.
The importance of individual “nature encounter” and “nature
experiences” is often cited in calls for increasing levels of individual
environmental concern as a remedy to environmental degradation.
Lately, this idea has found scholarly application in the perspective
of environmental connectedness and related studies looking for
possible pro-environmental behavior as outcomes of “nature
encounter.” The study presented in this article uses nature based
outdoor recreation as the general context to explore behavior
outcomes from nature experience. However, the study fails to
present a strong relationship between the measures of environmental
connectedness and environmental behavior. Results indicate
that connectedness does not automatically imply a
commitment to engage in the specific behaviors noted. This lack of
solidity is consistent with results presented in earlier research.
Urged by this, our article moves on to examine the environmental
connectedness perspective on a basis of perspectives
derived from the wider human geographical discussion regarding
the humaneenvironmental relationship. The examination reveals
that the construct of environmental connectedness is rooted in a
material/objective perspective, neglecting the human domain of
perceptions, values, and representations. The environment is portrayed
as a geographically undefined agent, “nature”, with the
inherent power to change human attitudes and behavior. Thus, the
environmental connectedness perspective bears resemblance to
environmental determinism, a set of ideas that is widely contested
within contemporary human geography.
This article argues that the environmental connectedness
perspective may suffer from dualistic thinking and a reliance on
simple causality. While this is also the case for most mainstream
geographical thought on the humaneenvironment relationship,
there are various disciplinary approaches that attempt to move on
from the unilateral relationship of dominance apparent in all
dualist thinking. In accordance with these, we suggest that the
nebulous category of nature should be replaced with the relational
concept of place. In fact, it can be stated with certainty that “nature
encounter” always takes place somewhere, remembering that the
previously noted environmental luminaries Henry David Thoreau,
John Muir, and Aldo Leopold grounded their thoughts and writings
in the experience of particular places: i.e. long term experiences in
and attachment to Walden, Yosemite, and the farm in Wisconsin's
Sand County.
Humanistic geographer Yi-Fu Tuan refers in his book, Topophilia:
a study of environmental perception (1974), to the significance of the
affective place-based bond between people and the environment.
Yet, to assume pro-environmental behavioral change as a necessary
outcome of spending time at particular places is to once again
relapse into simplicity and reductionism. Understanding reasons
for human behavior change calls for a much greater consideration
of covariance and complexity. This complexity goes beyond plain
progression models and their inherent pursuit for universality and
necessity, and refers to environmental concern as a phenomenon
occurring within the relations between individuals and their
various interacting contexts. One of these contexts, and the context
of the data from this research, may be that of outdoor recreation.
Though “nature encounter” is likely to fail as a general prescription
for pro-environmental change, regardless the suitability of any
particular location, there are still reasons to believe that recreational
settings, places, may facilitate and frame interpersonal relationships,
social formation, and behavior.
For further research we concur with the recommendation of
Müller et al. (2009) and promote their suggestion for more elaborate
developmental studies. We encourage a broadened methodological
approach as well, especially various qualitative methods.
Deliberate investigation of lived experience, i.e. stories of place
affiliation, may be able to provide better understanding into the
conditions and context necessary for motivation of proenvironmental
behavior. Qualitative inquiry may also offer insight
into how place can be more specifically operationalized for application
within future quantitative efforts.
Ultimately, we recommend conceptualizing not one pathway
from “nature” experience to environmental behavior, but many
paths of interplay between places of human affiliation and proenvironmental
behavior.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
สรุป
ความสำคัญของบุคคลธรรมชาติ " พบ " และ " ธรรมชาติ
ประสบการณ์ " มักจะอ้างในการโทรเพื่อเพิ่มระดับของบุคคล
ปัญหาสิ่งแวดล้อมเป็นยาสิ่งแวดล้อมเสื่อมโทรม .
ช่วงนี้ ความคิดนี้ได้พบวิชาการประยุกต์ใช้ในมุมมองของการเชื่อมโยงที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการศึกษาสิ่งแวดล้อม
และมองหา
ความสำคัญของบุคคลธรรมชาติ " พบ " และ " ธรรมชาติ
ประสบการณ์ " มักจะอ้างในการโทรเพื่อเพิ่มระดับของบุคคล
ปัญหาสิ่งแวดล้อมเป็นยาสิ่งแวดล้อมเสื่อมโทรม .
ช่วงนี้ ความคิดนี้ได้พบวิชาการประยุกต์ใช้ในมุมมองของการเชื่อมโยงที่เกี่ยวข้องกับการศึกษาสิ่งแวดล้อม
และมองหา
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
ภาษาอื่น ๆ
การสนับสนุนเครื่องมือแปลภาษา: กรีก, กันนาดา, กาลิเชียน, คลิงออน, คอร์สิกา, คาซัค, คาตาลัน, คินยารวันดา, คีร์กิซ, คุชราต, จอร์เจีย, จีน, จีนดั้งเดิม, ชวา, ชิเชวา, ซามัว, ซีบัวโน, ซุนดา, ซูลู, ญี่ปุ่น, ดัตช์, ตรวจหาภาษา, ตุรกี, ทมิฬ, ทาจิก, ทาทาร์, นอร์เวย์, บอสเนีย, บัลแกเรีย, บาสก์, ปัญจาป, ฝรั่งเศส, พาชตู, ฟริเชียน, ฟินแลนด์, ฟิลิปปินส์, ภาษาอินโดนีเซี, มองโกเลีย, มัลทีส, มาซีโดเนีย, มาราฐี, มาลากาซี, มาลายาลัม, มาเลย์, ม้ง, ยิดดิช, ยูเครน, รัสเซีย, ละติน, ลักเซมเบิร์ก, ลัตเวีย, ลาว, ลิทัวเนีย, สวาฮิลี, สวีเดน, สิงหล, สินธี, สเปน, สโลวัก, สโลวีเนีย, อังกฤษ, อัมฮาริก, อาร์เซอร์ไบจัน, อาร์เมเนีย, อาหรับ, อิกโบ, อิตาลี, อุยกูร์, อุสเบกิสถาน, อูรดู, ฮังการี, ฮัวซา, ฮาวาย, ฮินดี, ฮีบรู, เกลิกสกอต, เกาหลี, เขมร, เคิร์ด, เช็ก, เซอร์เบียน, เซโซโท, เดนมาร์ก, เตลูกู, เติร์กเมน, เนปาล, เบงกอล, เบลารุส, เปอร์เซีย, เมารี, เมียนมา (พม่า), เยอรมัน, เวลส์, เวียดนาม, เอสเปอแรนโต, เอสโทเนีย, เฮติครีโอล, แอฟริกา, แอลเบเนีย, โคซา, โครเอเชีย, โชนา, โซมาลี, โปรตุเกส, โปแลนด์, โยรูบา, โรมาเนีย, โอเดีย (โอริยา), ไทย, ไอซ์แลนด์, ไอร์แลนด์, การแปลภาษา.
- Mark up is 5% of the total cost
- ผ่านกระบวนการผลิตที่สะอาด และได้มาตรฐาน
- whichใช่้กับสิ่งของแต่Whenใช้กับช่วงเวลา
- showed a high vertical migration capacit
- Not is us
- I can't read Thai language
- แล้ว
- คุณกินมื้อค้ำก่อน ฉันรอคุณได้
- สบาย
- คุณควรจะไปนอนซะ
- single
- But such simple correlations can only sh
- when are you free
- Usually, the human brain will order one
- you driver license
- คงไปไม่ได้
- furious
- I've lose my mind
- ที่รักคุณต้องมาหาฉันสัญญา
- ได้สิ...หรือคุณจะให้ฉันไปพบที่ไหนOr you
- Limited
- I'm interested in take a photo & lego. S
- มอสซาเรลาชีส
- เราจะไม่ได้สารอาหารสำคัญที่ช่วยความจำตลอ
