The AHP Method could be quite useful in identification of noise prone areas. In other words, spending less time and money, AHP makes it possible to detect critical areas in terms of noise pollution for taking appropriate mitigation measures. This method could even be a tool for indirect estimation of noise pollution by which instead of direct measurement of the equivalent sound level, it is possible to predict noise level considering the types of passages, urban land uses, number and type of the vehicles, population centers, etc. Many researchers worldwide have proved capability of AHP method. As such, Kheirkhah Zarkesh et al. (2010) introduced AHP as a powerful decision making method with an extraordinary ability to handle planning group with a systematic approach. Jozi et al. (2011) evaluated AHP a suitable technique for complex decisionmaking situations. In a research by Zaredar and Kheirkhah Zarkesh (2012) it was concluded that despite usefulness of AHP in being fast, easy, and low expense, it has some weaknesses like very high sensitivity to decision maker’s idea. This is in conflict with the findings of this research.