In general, interactive LBAs were considered to be more professional, trustworthy, and informative than static LBAs. The overall liking for interactive LBAs was clearly higher than the static LBAs. For the participants purchase intentions, the pop up version showed a significant and very high increase between static and interactive with a very large effect size. This also confirms the first hypothesis. During the interviews, participants also stated they were very pleased with the possibility to read more about the product if they so desired than simply see a picture, a name and a price. These results are in line with Schrum, Lowrey and Liu (2009), who have indicated that the possibility to browse through more information creates a more personalized and customized marketing content. We were also able to confirm the second hypothesis. Participants liked the navigation options for the dynamic LBAs and stated that it made the advertisement more attractive. Not only did the participants find the dynamic LBAs more likeable, they also found them to be more informative, intelligible and professional. The confirmation of this hypothesis is congruent with the research of Liu and Schrum (2009) that indicates that the mere presence of interactivity attracts more interest than the static pages. Our research has confirmed the hypothesis that interactive LBAs are preferred over static ones and most importantly additional information in the form of a pupup screen enhances purchase intention. In the future we would like to extend our research by investigating LBA’s for products external to the food industry e.g. clothing. We would also like to explore different visualization techniques for showing additional information. We would also like to clarify that essentially our findings could also apply to in general any mobile displays and not necessarily location based advertisements. In addition, a limitation of our study was that it was “lab-based” and not conducted in a real outdoor environment.