Finally, we performed the regression analysis in which WFC was set as the dependent variable. At first, the variables age, work experience, cohabitation with a partner and medical specialty were statistically controlled (table 5). These control variables accounted for 5% of the variance in WFCs (model 1). The variables age and years of experience were found to predict WFC (age:β=−0.12, p=0.03; years of experience: β=−0.11, p=0.04).In the second step, the included personal resources accounted for an additional 10% of the variance (R2 increased to 0.15) (model 2). Personal resources like
resilient coping were found to predict WFC (β=−0.18,p=0.01), similar to self-efficacy (β=−0.12; p=0.01) and optimism
(β=−0.10, p=0.03), while pessimism did not.
Finally, we performed the regression analysis in which WFC was set as the dependent variable. At first, the variables age, work experience, cohabitation with a partner and medical specialty were statistically controlled (table 5). These control variables accounted for 5% of the variance in WFCs (model 1). The variables age and years of experience were found to predict WFC (age:β=−0.12, p=0.03; years of experience: β=−0.11, p=0.04).In the second step, the included personal resources accounted for an additional 10% of the variance (R2 increased to 0.15) (model 2). Personal resources likeresilient coping were found to predict WFC (β=−0.18,p=0.01), similar to self-efficacy (β=−0.12; p=0.01) and optimism (β=−0.10, p=0.03), while pessimism did not.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
