However, the groups prioritized the three restrictions
differently. Group A designed a product for managing wires that
involves the easy insertion of wires into a designed linear slit.
To satisfy the space constraint, the designers of group A avoided
designing bulky furniture, and they used cheap material to reduce
the price of the product. However, group A continually focused
on the need for easy management of wires to be adapted to actual
contexts. The designers of group B emphasized “tight budgets”
and so sought to design a product that solved many problems
simultaneously. In addition, they designed modularized products
that people can buy as needed. Group C designed a sharing
platform, not a product, because they concluded that target
users are annoyed with the effort required to manage wires. The
designers of group C believed that fun aspects of their designed
platform would motivate people to manage wires. Finally, group
D mostly focused on the tight budget constraint. To solve this
problem, they came up with the idea of recycling products from
packaging, adding accessories to products already possessed,
and multiple-use products. The final design of group D was a
clothespin-like clip for holding wires and other items such as
clothes and paper