Condition one considers the potential negative and positive outcomes of the transaction to the relatively disadvantaged
individual(s) from the perspective of the relevant, local social group/community, members of whom engage in deliberation to evaluate whether the condition is met. As such, the condition’s probability measure is grounded in the lived experiences and material conditions of members of the social group/community who enter into transactions (as opposed to the analysis being framed in, or referenced to, Western liberal and feminist moralities). Condition two requires evaluators to examine the morally relevant circumstances and factors that influence/shape the relatively disadvantaged individual’s exercise of her/his autonomy. Condition three incorporates the Youngian justice requirement that the interests of core stakeholders be
taken into meaningful account in decision making, and evaluates
whether those who perform the role of labor workers
within the transaction have an adequate degree of influence
and control over the terms and conditions of their
employment.