However, the most useful material according to the midwives was the modes of transmission of HIV because before the training they were very afraid of the infection. After knowing how HIV can and cannot be transmitted their fear subsided. Moreover, the most favorite material among the midwives was the topic of prevention because it related to the transmission of HIV, even more because of the nature of participants’ occupation as health workers which has a high risk of HIV infection. Some of the participants did not really like the material on ARV medicines because they thought it was difficult to memorize the types and they felt that it was not within their authority to assign medicines.
The evaluation from the facilitator was that the program would be better implemented in a particular day and the midwives should get assignment letter from the head of PHC. The purpose was to ensure the midwives were in their top condition and could concentrate more on the program. Moreover, according to the facilitator, it would be better if the head of PHC gave the opening speech of the program so that the midwives could follow the whole process more seriously. By giving the opening speech, the head of PHC would also feel the responsibility in PMTCT of HIV. Regarding the room temperature and the behaviors of several participants like being sleepy or being busy with their cellular phones, facilitator argued that such problems were challenges for the facilitator. They must be able to maintain conducive learning atmosphere.
The observers reported that all participants seemed to be enthusiastic in following the program and some participants seemed to more active compared to some others in asking and responding to questions. The high temperature of the room made participants and facilitator break into sweat, despite the presence of two electric fans. During the process, a few participants seemed sleepy while some seemed to be busy with their cellular phones. Seeing such reactions, facilitator delivered the materials in a louder voice and sometimes approached participants that seemed to be unfocused. Facilitator seemed to master the materials given and could deliver them systematically so that all materials were delivered well.
According to observational data, observers did not find socialization of HIV and AIDS during the consultation process between midwives and patients in HMCP, neither before nor after the psychoeducation. From the interview result with observed midwives and program evaluation of midwives in experimental group through FGD, the reasons why the midwives did not give socialization of HIV and AIDS to HMCP's patients were revealed.
The midwives assessed that it was unnecessary to give socialization of HIV to HMCP's patients if they did not find the symptoms or medical history of patients that lead to HIV.
However, the most useful material according to the midwives was the modes of transmission of HIV because before the training they were very afraid of the infection. After knowing how HIV can and cannot be transmitted their fear subsided. Moreover, the most favorite material among the midwives was the topic of prevention because it related to the transmission of HIV, even more because of the nature of participants’ occupation as health workers which has a high risk of HIV infection. Some of the participants did not really like the material on ARV medicines because they thought it was difficult to memorize the types and they felt that it was not within their authority to assign medicines.
The evaluation from the facilitator was that the program would be better implemented in a particular day and the midwives should get assignment letter from the head of PHC. The purpose was to ensure the midwives were in their top condition and could concentrate more on the program. Moreover, according to the facilitator, it would be better if the head of PHC gave the opening speech of the program so that the midwives could follow the whole process more seriously. By giving the opening speech, the head of PHC would also feel the responsibility in PMTCT of HIV. Regarding the room temperature and the behaviors of several participants like being sleepy or being busy with their cellular phones, facilitator argued that such problems were challenges for the facilitator. They must be able to maintain conducive learning atmosphere.
The observers reported that all participants seemed to be enthusiastic in following the program and some participants seemed to more active compared to some others in asking and responding to questions. The high temperature of the room made participants and facilitator break into sweat, despite the presence of two electric fans. During the process, a few participants seemed sleepy while some seemed to be busy with their cellular phones. Seeing such reactions, facilitator delivered the materials in a louder voice and sometimes approached participants that seemed to be unfocused. Facilitator seemed to master the materials given and could deliver them systematically so that all materials were delivered well.
According to observational data, observers did not find socialization of HIV and AIDS during the consultation process between midwives and patients in HMCP, neither before nor after the psychoeducation. From the interview result with observed midwives and program evaluation of midwives in experimental group through FGD, the reasons why the midwives did not give socialization of HIV and AIDS to HMCP's patients were revealed.
The midwives assessed that it was unnecessary to give socialization of HIV to HMCP's patients if they did not find the symptoms or medical history of patients that lead to HIV.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
