Conclusions
Building Information Modeling (BIM) is emerging as an innovative way to manage projects. Building performance and predictability of outcomes are greatly improved by adopting BIM. As the use of BIM accelerates, collaboration within project teams should increase, which will lead to improved profitability, reduced costs, better time management and improved customer/client relationships. As shown in this paper, average BIM return on investment is 94.86%, which clearly depicts its lucrative economic benefits. On the other hand, teams implementing BIM should be very careful about the legal pitfall such as data ownership and associated propriety issues and risk sharing. Such issues must be addressed upfront in the contract documents. BIM represents a new paradigm within AEC, one that encourages integration of the roles of all stakeholders on a project. This has the potential to bring about great efficiency as well as harmony among players who all too often in the past saw themselves as adversaries. As in most paradigm shifts there will undoubtedly be risks associated with this change, Perhaps one of the greatest risk is the potential elimination of as important checks and balance mechanism inherent in the current paradigm. An adversarial stance often brings a more critical review of the project in a kind of mutual guarding of their own interests among the participants. In the early stages of BIM , constructors worked from architectural plans since digital models were not shared by architects with contractors. The construction modelers inevitably discovered errors and inconsistencies in the plans as they created the BIM. This brought about a natural redundancy as the construction model put the design to this virtual building test. With a more trustful sharing of architectural drawings, which can be easily be imported and serve as the basis for the BIM model, there may be a loss of this critical checking phase. In other words when all players see themselves on the same team they may cease to look for and find mistakes in each other’s work. In the past, a lack of critical review has been at least one of the component ingredients of building failure.
Conclusions Building Information Modeling (BIM) is emerging as an innovative way to manage projects. Building performance and predictability of outcomes are greatly improved by adopting BIM. As the use of BIM accelerates, collaboration within project teams should increase, which will lead to improved profitability, reduced costs, better time management and improved customer/client relationships. As shown in this paper, average BIM return on investment is 94.86%, which clearly depicts its lucrative economic benefits. On the other hand, teams implementing BIM should be very careful about the legal pitfall such as data ownership and associated propriety issues and risk sharing. Such issues must be addressed upfront in the contract documents. BIM represents a new paradigm within AEC, one that encourages integration of the roles of all stakeholders on a project. This has the potential to bring about great efficiency as well as harmony among players who all too often in the past saw themselves as adversaries. As in most paradigm shifts there will undoubtedly be risks associated with this change, Perhaps one of the greatest risk is the potential elimination of as important checks and balance mechanism inherent in the current paradigm. An adversarial stance often brings a more critical review of the project in a kind of mutual guarding of their own interests among the participants. In the early stages of BIM , constructors worked from architectural plans since digital models were not shared by architects with contractors. The construction modelers inevitably discovered errors and inconsistencies in the plans as they created the BIM. This brought about a natural redundancy as the construction model put the design to this virtual building test. With a more trustful sharing of architectural drawings, which can be easily be imported and serve as the basis for the BIM model, there may be a loss of this critical checking phase. In other words when all players see themselves on the same team they may cease to look for and find mistakes in each other’s work. In the past, a lack of critical review has been at least one of the component ingredients of building failure.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
