15. Two prongs of strategy: both areas needed to be successful in disaster
management.
16. Management deals with mitigating the eff ects of a disaster.
17. Education of the public on disaster management is necessary for compliance.
18. Funding is unfortunately greatly skewed to Military, also Security and
Intelligence.
19. Needs to be reprioritized to include Management and Education funding.
20. Disaster preparation in hospitals is too costly to maintain without government
support.
21. Remember, every hospital must be brought up to the minimum standard of
preparedness.
22. Hospitals can’t easily move; can’t predict which will be involved; all must be
prepared.
23. Failure to provide resources will leave hospitals as the weak link in the disaster
chain.
24. Hospitals lose great sums of money during disasters for a variety of reasons.
25. Th ree considerations: Pre-disaster appeal; Concurrent funding; Post-disaster
appeal.
26. Upgrade hospital resources before they are needed.
27. Problem is that there is no precedent, so it is hard to convince funding sources
of need.
28. Competition: other hospitals, from disaster or not, seeking disaster upgrades.
29. Competition: other fi rst responders, take precedent because hospitals not
considered.
30. Competition: other disaster aspects, particularly military and security and
intelligence.
31. Competition: other unrelated proposals; often due to political agendas and
associations.
32. Concurrent funding requests are important to keep the hospital functioning.
33. Th e manpower to prepare proposals is diffi cult to fi nd during a disaster; staff
is doing other tasks.
34. Process for requests and proposals must be simplifi ed.
35. Grant writers and lobbists are benefi cial for breaking through red tape and
political favoritism.
36. Proposals can fail for any number of reasons, mostly illogical.
37. Post-disaster appeals are similar to Pre-disaster appeals.
38. Simpler, because the needs and losses are more easily corroborated and
justifi ed.
39. However, circumstances are more desperate and the appeal is much more
time-sensitive.
40. Service losses, facility damage, manpower, supply, and equipment must all be
addressed.
15. Two prongs of strategy: both areas needed to be successful in disastermanagement. 16. Management deals with mitigating the eff ects of a disaster. 17. Education of the public on disaster management is necessary for compliance. 18. Funding is unfortunately greatly skewed to Military, also Security andIntelligence. 19. Needs to be reprioritized to include Management and Education funding. 20. Disaster preparation in hospitals is too costly to maintain without governmentsupport. 21. Remember, every hospital must be brought up to the minimum standard ofpreparedness. 22. Hospitals can’t easily move; can’t predict which will be involved; all must beprepared. 23. Failure to provide resources will leave hospitals as the weak link in the disasterchain. 24. Hospitals lose great sums of money during disasters for a variety of reasons. 25. Th ree considerations: Pre-disaster appeal; Concurrent funding; Post-disasterappeal. 26. Upgrade hospital resources before they are needed. 27. Problem is that there is no precedent, so it is hard to convince funding sourcesof need. 28. Competition: other hospitals, from disaster or not, seeking disaster upgrades. 29. Competition: other fi rst responders, take precedent because hospitals notconsidered. 30. Competition: other disaster aspects, particularly military and security andintelligence. 31. Competition: other unrelated proposals; often due to political agendas andassociations. 32. Concurrent funding requests are important to keep the hospital functioning. 33. Th e manpower to prepare proposals is diffi cult to fi nd during a disaster; staffis doing other tasks. 34. Process for requests and proposals must be simplifi ed. 35. Grant writers and lobbists are benefi cial for breaking through red tape andpolitical favoritism. 36. Proposals can fail for any number of reasons, mostly illogical. 37. Post-disaster appeals are similar to Pre-disaster appeals. 38. Simpler, because the needs and losses are more easily corroborated andjustifi ed. 39. However, circumstances are more desperate and the appeal is much moretime-sensitive. 40. Service losses, facility damage, manpower, supply, and equipment must all beaddressed.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..