Why it is important to do this revi

Why it is important to do this review
As greater adherence to dietary advice is a critical component in
preventing and managing chronic diseases, research is needed to
identify the characteristics of interventions that will result in a better
agreement between health professionals’ evidence-based dietary
advice, and their clients’ eating patterns. Despite growing recognition
that non-adherence to dietary advice is a barrier to getting
new nutrition knowledge into practice, previous knowledge syntheses
have provided decision makers and knowledge users with
little practical guidance on the development of useable interventions
for enhancing adherence to dietary advice. Studies have reported
on interventions designed to enhance adherence to dietary
advice by overcoming barriers to adherence. Although some studies
have reported positive effects of interventions to enhance adherence
to dietary advice, no systematic review specifically assesses
dietary interventions that lead to sustained dietary changes or that
refer to a wide array of chronic diseases. Haynes 2008 summarized
the results of RCTs of interventions to help clients adhere to prescriptions
for medications for medical problems, and excluded interventions
targeting dietary advice. Bosch-Capblanch 2007 systematically
reviewed the effects of contracts between clients and
health professionals for improving clients’ adherence to treatment,
prevention and health promotion activities. Although this review
is relevant to our review, it reported only the effect of contracts
(as opposed to other interventions), and was not specific to dietary
advice. Several non-Cochrane reviews may overlap with our
review, but these are not systematic (Brownell 1995b; Brownell
1995a; Burke 1997; Newell 2000; Fappa 2008) and/or are related
to only one health condition and not specifically targeting dietary
advice (Burke 1997; Newell 2000; Fappa 2008).
This review will improve the knowledge base for adherence to
dietary advice; a topic of immense importance for dietetics practice
that will also be relevant to clients, and other health professionals.

ผลลัพธ์ (ไทย) 3:

ทำไมมันเป็นสิ่งสำคัญที่ต้องทำรีวิวนี้
เป็นการยึดมั่นมากขึ้นเพื่ออาหารแนะนำเป็นองค์ประกอบที่สำคัญใน
ป้องกันและจัดการโรคเรื้อรัง การวิจัยเป็นสิ่งจำเป็นเพื่อ
ระบุลักษณะของการแทรกแซงนั้นจะส่งผลดีกว่า
ข้อตกลงระหว่างผู้ประกอบวิชาชีพด้านสุขภาพตามหลักฐานอาหาร
คำแนะนำ และลูกค้าของพวกเขากินแบบ แม้จะมีการรับรู้
ที่ไม่ยึดมั่นในอาหารแนะนำคือ อุปสรรคที่จะได้รับความรู้ใหม่ในการฝึกโภชนาการ

มีการสังเคราะห์ความรู้เดิมให้ผู้ตัดสินใจและความรู้ผู้ใช้
น้อยปฏิบัติแนวทางการพัฒนาเพื่อส่งเสริมการใช้มาตรการ
อาหารแนะนำ . การศึกษารายงาน
ในการแทรกแซงที่ออกแบบมาเพื่อเพิ่มเสริมอาหาร
advice by overcoming barriers to adherence. Although some studies
have reported positive effects of interventions to enhance adherence
to dietary advice, no systematic review specifically assesses
dietary interventions that lead to sustained dietary changes or that
refer to a wide array of chronic diseases. Haynes 2008 summarized
the results of RCTs of interventions to help clients adhere to prescriptions
for medications for medical problems, and excluded interventions
targeting dietary advice. Bosch-Capblanch 2007 systematically
reviewed the effects of contracts between clients and
health professionals for improving clients’ adherence to treatment,
prevention and health promotion activities. Although this review
is relevant to our review, it reported only the effect of contracts
(as opposed to other interventions), and was not specific to dietary
advice. Several non-Cochrane reviews may overlap with our
review, but these are not systematic (Brownell 1995b; Brownell
1995a; Burke 1997; Newell 2000; Fappa 2008) and/or are related
to only one health condition and not specifically targeting dietary
advice (Burke 1997; Newell 2000; Fappa 2008).
This review will improve the knowledge base for adherence to
dietary advice; a topic of immense importance for dietetics practice
that will also be relevant to clients, and other health professionals.