If they do not, then all sorts of expert and non-expert witnesses will be able to invoke this notion as well.
Why should the manufacturer of litmus paper not be able to claim that her litmus paper has a zero “methodological error rate” because substances are either acid, base, or neutral?
why not allow the eyewitness to claim a zero “methodological error rate” because only one
person was seen? Why not allow a medium to claim a zero “methodological error rate” because the defendant is either guilty or innocent?
Why not allow all pregnancy tests to claim a zero “methodological error rate” because all women either are pregnant or are not?
The scientific and forensic scientific communities should also explicitly disavow the notion of “methodological error rate” as it is framed by latent print examiners.