Comparison of our values with those from literature, as given in Fig. 5,for the binary mixtures shows good agreement. The values for P–L, although, depict significant offsets for the compositions xP of 0.5 and 0.7, which might be caused by the method used in that work [16]. In the mentioned literature, higher heating rates of 3K min−1 were used, which is known to cause shifting of peak temperatures to higher values.Regarding the peak for the eutectic temperature all literature values are lower, which cannot be explained because no further information about sample preparation or sample masses are given. The overall offset is low and our values are showing a good agreement for the P–L and S–L system