Rule 102 - Integrity and Objectivity. Violation. This rule states that in tax practice, a member may resolve doubt in favor of his or her client as long as there is reasonable support for his or her position. In the example case, the client has provided no support for the unusual deductions. Sarah Milsaps has violated Rule 102 by not requiring reasonable support for the deductions.
Rule 203 - Accounting Principles. Violation. This rule designates that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is the established body for issuing international financial accounting standards. Roberta Hernandez's assertion that the financial statements are based on international financial accounting standards would be in violation of Rule 203 because she did not use standards issued by the IASB.
Rules 101 and 102 - Independence, and Integrity and Objectivity. Violation. Appearance of independence has been impaired by Steve Custer's agency's financial dealing with his audit clients and participation in a business, which impairs his objectivity. It is also a conflict of duties to recommend his own firm to review the adequacy of the existing insurance coverage of existing clients.
Rule 301 - Confidential Client Information. Violation. The client should have been notified that the review was to take place, and an attempt made to obtain the client's permission for such review since the review was not a part of an AICPA, state CPA society, or Board of Accountancy review program. The firms violated Rule 301 by not obtaining consent from the client for the review.
Rule 501 - Acts Discreditable. No violation. The rule is vague and the interpretation would be made by the state Board of Accountancy. In most states this will be a civil action and would not likely be a violation.
Rule 102 - Integrity and Objectivity. Violation. This rule states that in tax practice, a member may resolve doubt in favor of his or her client as long as there is reasonable support for his or her position. In the example case, the client has provided no support for the unusual deductions. Sarah Milsaps has violated Rule 102 by not requiring reasonable support for the deductions.
Rule 203 - Accounting Principles. Violation. This rule designates that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) is the established body for issuing international financial accounting standards. Roberta Hernandez's assertion that the financial statements are based on international financial accounting standards would be in violation of Rule 203 because she did not use standards issued by the IASB.
Rules 101 and 102 - Independence, and Integrity and Objectivity. Violation. Appearance of independence has been impaired by Steve Custer's agency's financial dealing with his audit clients and participation in a business, which impairs his objectivity. It is also a conflict of duties to recommend his own firm to review the adequacy of the existing insurance coverage of existing clients.
Rule 301 - Confidential Client Information. Violation. The client should have been notified that the review was to take place, and an attempt made to obtain the client's permission for such review since the review was not a part of an AICPA, state CPA society, or Board of Accountancy review program. The firms violated Rule 301 by not obtaining consent from the client for the review.
Rule 501 - Acts Discreditable. No violation. The rule is vague and the interpretation would be made by the state Board of Accountancy. In most states this will be a civil action and would not likely be a violation.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98aba/98abadb1435b0cfbe63f2dabdddc22693678da81" alt=""