After defining 60 m of space around each route, suitability
scores for each corridor are extracted, and Table 4 summarizes the
results. Route 1 shows the lowest suitability scores in the grand
total, whereas Route 2 results in the highest. Looking at the
numbers in detail, it is evident that each route ranked good suitability
- low suitability scores in its prioritized variables. This is a
reasonable output as the initial intention for dividing the variables
into groups is to purposely avoid and detour around those variables
in each factor structure. Route 1 scored the lowest in suitability
score for Population Density, Job Density, and Occupancy Rate
variables, all of which represent the Socio-Demographic Factor.
Route 2 scored the least in Road Network, Noise, and Land Use
variables, and Route 3 indicates the lowest suitability scores for the
variables in Factor 3, Ground Resources. Route 4, designed to avoid
the variables in Factor 4, Water Resources, accordingly demonstrates
the lowest suitability in Hydrology, Floodplain, andWetland
variables. Finally, Route 5 scored the least suitability in Factor 5’s
Slope, Vegetation, and Productive Farm variables. This result indicates
that the proposed modeling process reveals the possibility
of maintaining the research proposition. As stated in the research
question two, if the modeling process is correctly carried out, the
outcome should indicate lowest suitability scores for each corresponding
variable and Table 4 clearly shows the evidence.
After defining 60 m of space around each route, suitabilityscores for each corridor are extracted, and Table 4 summarizes theresults. Route 1 shows the lowest suitability scores in the grandtotal, whereas Route 2 results in the highest. Looking at thenumbers in detail, it is evident that each route ranked good suitability- low suitability scores in its prioritized variables. This is areasonable output as the initial intention for dividing the variablesinto groups is to purposely avoid and detour around those variablesin each factor structure. Route 1 scored the lowest in suitabilityscore for Population Density, Job Density, and Occupancy Ratevariables, all of which represent the Socio-Demographic Factor.Route 2 scored the least in Road Network, Noise, and Land Usevariables, and Route 3 indicates the lowest suitability scores for thevariables in Factor 3, Ground Resources. Route 4, designed to avoidthe variables in Factor 4, Water Resources, accordingly demonstratesthe lowest suitability in Hydrology, Floodplain, andWetlandvariables. Finally, Route 5 scored the least suitability in Factor 5’sSlope, Vegetation, and Productive Farm variables. This result indicatesthat the proposed modeling process reveals the possibilityof maintaining the research proposition. As stated in the researchquestion two, if the modeling process is correctly carried out, theoutcome should indicate lowest suitability scores for each correspondingตัวแปรและตาราง 4 ชัดเจนแสดงหลักฐาน
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..