Feminist social and political theorists, as well as feminists in law and the
humanities, often write about issues such as capitalism, corporations,
globalization, or the economics of caring labor. Yet they often neglect
the considerable body of work that has now been developed by feminist
economists, dating back to at least the early 1990s. Perhaps this neglect
would be understandable if this literature were difficult to access. But
work by feminist economists has been disseminated in interdisciplinary
journals (e.g., Feiner and Roberts 1990), in accessible compilations,1 and
in a journal (Feminist Economics) now entering its second decade of publishing.
The field of feminist economics has recently been the subject of
review articles appearing in venues outside the economics discipline (e.g.,
Meulders 2001; Meagher and Nelson 2004). Why is it, then, that feminist
social and political theory about economics often draws so little on work
done by feminist scholars within the field?
Feminist social and political theorists, as well as feminists in law and thehumanities, often write about issues such as capitalism, corporations,globalization, or the economics of caring labor. Yet they often neglectthe considerable body of work that has now been developed by feministeconomists, dating back to at least the early 1990s. Perhaps this neglectwould be understandable if this literature were difficult to access. Butwork by feminist economists has been disseminated in interdisciplinaryjournals (e.g., Feiner and Roberts 1990), in accessible compilations,1 andin a journal (Feminist Economics) now entering its second decade of publishing.The field of feminist economics has recently been the subject ofreview articles appearing in venues outside the economics discipline (e.g.,Meulders 2001; Meagher and Nelson 2004). Why is it, then, that feministsocial and political theory about economics often draws so little on workdone by feminist scholars within the field?
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
