Howdoesrevenuefromnaturalresourcesaffectthesocialpoliciesofauthoritariangovern-ments?Iexaminetheeffectsofnaturalresourceendowmentsonvarioussocialpoliciesinauthoritarianregimes.Throughtheoreticalandempiricalanalyses,Ishowthatnaturalre-sourceabundance,whichgeneratessignificanteconomicrevenueswithoutextensivelaborforceparticipation,lowerstheincentivesofauthoritarianleaderstoinvestinlaborproduc-tivity,andthusreducespublicspendingforhumancapitaldevelopment.Thefirstchapterpresentsatheoreticalargumentthatexplainsthelinksbetweenadictator’sneedforlaborforceparticipationineconomicproduction,thepotentialpoliticalthreatfromcitizens,andthelevelandpatternofsocialwelfareprovisionunderanauthoritarianregime.Thesecondchapterprovidescross-nationalempiricalanalysisfocusingontheroleofnaturalresources,particularlyoil,inthewelfarepoliticsofauthoritarianstates.Usingapaneldatasetofau-thoritarianregimesbetween1972and2008,Ifindthatabundanceinfuelmineralresourcessuchasoilleadstosignificantlylowerlevelsofsocialspendingbythecentralgovernmentsofautocracies.Thenegativeeffectsofoilareespeciallyprominentconcerningexpendituresforpubliceducationandhealth.Furthermore,theanalysisrevealsthatwelfarebenefitstocitizensinoil-exportingauthoritarianregimesareparticularlyvulnerabletochangesinthepriceofoil:Governmentexpendituresonpublicwelfaredeclineevenmoreprecipitouslythanotherformsofspendingwhenoilpricesfall.Extendedanalysesincludingbothdictatorshipsanddemocraciesshowthattheimpactofnaturalresourcesdiffersacrossregimetypes.Indemocracies,Ifindnosignificantnegativeimpactofnaturalresourcesongovernmentspend-v
Howdoesrevenuefromnaturalresourcesaffectthesocialpoliciesofauthoritariangovern-ments Iexaminetheeffectsofnaturalresourceendowmentsonvarioussocialpoliciesinauthoritarianregimes.Throughtheoreticalandempiricalanalyses,Ishowthatnaturalre-sourceabundance, whichgeneratessignificanteconomicrevenueswithoutextensivelaborforceparticipation, lowerstheincentivesofauthoritarianleaderstoinvestinlaborproduc-tivity, andthusreducespublicspendingforhumancapitaldevelopment Thefirstchapterpresentsatheoreticalargumentthatexplainsthelinksbetweenadictator'sneedforlaborforceparticipationineconomicproduction, thepotentialpoliticalthreatfromcitizens, andthelevelandpatternofsocialwelfareprovisionunderanauthoritarianregime Thesecondchapterprovidescross-nationalempiricalanalysisfocusingontheroleofnaturalresources, particularlyoil, inthewelfarepoliticsofauthoritarianstates Usingapaneldatasetofau-thoritarianregimesbetween1972and2008,Ifindthatabundanceinfuelmineralresourcessuchasoilleadstosignificantlylowerlevelsofsocialspendingbythecentralgovernmentsofautocracies.Thenegativeeffectsofoilareespeciallyprominentconcerningexpendituresforpubliceducationandhealth.Furthermore,theanalysisrevealsthatwelfarebenefitstocitizensinoil-exportingauthoritarianregimesareparticularlyvulnerabletochangesinthepriceofoil:Governmentexpendituresonpublicwelfaredeclineevenmoreprecipitouslythanotherformsofspendingwhenoilpricesfall.Extendedanalysesincludingbothdictatorshipsanddemocraciesshowthattheimpactofnaturalresourcesdiffersacrossregimetypes.Indemocracies,Ifindnosignificantnegativeimpactofnaturalresourcesongovernmentspend-v
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
Howdoesrevenuefromnaturalresourcesaffectthesocialpoliciesofauthoritariangovern-ments?Iexaminetheeffectsofnaturalresourceendowmentsonvarioussocialpoliciesinauthoritarianregimes.Throughtheoreticalandempiricalanalyses,Ishowthatnaturalre-sourceabundance,whichgeneratessignificanteconomicrevenueswithoutextensivelaborforceparticipation,lowerstheincentivesofauthoritarianleaderstoinvestinlaborproduc-tivity,andthusreducespublicspendingforhumancapitaldevelopment.Thefirstchapterpresentsatheoreticalargumentthatexplainsthelinksbetweenadictator'sneedforlaborforceparticipationineconomicproduction,thepotentialpoliticalthreatfromcitizens,andthelevelandpatternofsocialwelfareprovisionunderanauthoritarianregime.Thesecondchapterprovidescross-nationalempiricalanalysisfocusingontheroleofnaturalresources,particularlyoil,inthewelfarepoliticsofauthoritarianstates.Usingapaneldatasetofau-thoritarianregimesbetween1972and2008,Ifindthatabundanceinfuelmineralresourcessuchasoilleadstosignificantlylowerlevelsofsocialspendingbythecentralgovernmentsofautocracies.Thenegativeeffectsofoilareespeciallyprominentconcerningexpendituresforpubliceducationandhealth.Furthermore,theanalysisrevealsthatwelfarebenefitstocitizensinoil-exportingauthoritarianregimesareparticularlyvulnerabletochangesinthepriceofoil:Governmentexpendituresonpublicwelfaredeclineevenmoreprecipitouslythanotherformsofspendingwhenoilpricesfall.Extendedanalysesincludingbothdictatorshipsanddemocraciesshowthattheimpactofnaturalresourcesdiffersacrossregimetypes.Indemocracies,Ifindnosignificantnegativeimpactofnaturalresourcesongovernmentspend-v
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
howdoesrevenuefromnaturalresourcesa ff ectthesocialpoliciesofauthoritariangovern ments ? iexaminethee ff ectsofnaturalresourceendowmentsonvarioussocialpoliciesinauthoritarianregimes . throughtheoreticalandempiricalanalyses ishowthatnaturalre sourceabundance whichgeneratessigni จึง canteconomicrevenueswithoutextensivelaborforceparticipation , , ,lowerstheincentivesofauthoritarianleaderstoinvestinlaborproduc tivity andthusreducespublicspendingforhumancapitaldevelopment , . จึง rstchapterpresentsatheoreticalargumentthatexplainsthelinksbetweenadictator'sneedforlaborforceparticipationineconomicproduction thepotentialpoliticalthreatfromcitizens andthelevelandpatternofsocialwelfareprovisionunderanauthoritarianregime , , .thesecondchapterprovidescross nationalempiricalanalysisfocusingontheroleofnaturalresources particularlyoil inthewelfarepoliticsofauthoritarianstates , , . usingapaneldatasetofau-thoritarianregimesbetween1972and2008 ผมจึง ndthatabundanceinfuelmineralresourcessuchasoilleadstosigni จึง cantlylowerlevelsofsocialspendingbythecentralgovernmentsofautocracies .thenegativee ff ectsofoilareespeciallyprominentconcerningexpendituresforpubliceducationandhealth นอกจากนี้ theanalysisrevealsthatwelfarebene จึง tstocitizensinoil exportingauthoritarianregimesareparticularlyvulnerabletochangesinthepriceofoil : governmentexpendituresonpublicwelfaredeclineevenmoreprecipitouslythanotherformsofspendingwhenoilpricesfall .extendedanalysesincludingbothdictatorshipsanddemocraciesshowthattheimpactofnaturalresourcesdi ff ersacrossregimetypes . indemocracies ผมจึง ndnosigni จึง cantnegativeimpactofnaturalresourcesongovernmentspend-v
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..