The substitution of BPF for CWF improved the nutritional characteristics
of the BCtr (ash and crude fibre). Physical analyses indicated
that the substitution of BPF for wheat flour reduced the
quality of the end-use products. However, the addition of the
CMC to the bread improved the loaf volume, density and height.
These improvements were not observed in bread with the addition
of XG. In addition, breads containing BPF resulted in a darker
crumb appearance and lighter crust colour than the control bread.
Chemical analyses, revealed that the partial substitution of BPF at
10% in the bread formulation increased the total phenolics content
and the FRAP and DPPH values in the composite breads compared
with the control. Breads containing BPF had greater soluble, insolFig.
1. Bread crumb cross-sectional views from BCtr, B10BPF, B10BPFXG and B10BPFCMC.
Fig. 2. Average of the parameters on sensory evaluation of control and 10% BPF substitution breads.
538 L.-H. Ho et al. / Food Chemistry 139 (2013) 532–539
uble and total dietary fibre contents than the control bread. Furthermore,
the BPF-incorporated bread and the breads with the
addition of hydrocolloids did not alter the acceptability ratings
by the panellists. However, bread supplemented with CMC had
the greatest acceptability ratings by the panellists.
The substitution of BPF for CWF improved the nutritional characteristicsof the BCtr (ash and crude fibre). Physical analyses indicatedthat the substitution of BPF for wheat flour reduced thequality of the end-use products. However, the addition of theCMC to the bread improved the loaf volume, density and height.These improvements were not observed in bread with the additionof XG. In addition, breads containing BPF resulted in a darkercrumb appearance and lighter crust colour than the control bread.Chemical analyses, revealed that the partial substitution of BPF at10% in the bread formulation increased the total phenolics contentand the FRAP and DPPH values in the composite breads comparedwith the control. Breads containing BPF had greater soluble, insolFig.1. Bread crumb cross-sectional views from BCtr, B10BPF, B10BPFXG and B10BPFCMC.Fig. 2. Average of the parameters on sensory evaluation of control and 10% BPF substitution breads.538 L.-H. Ho et al. / Food Chemistry 139 (2013) 532–539uble and total dietary fibre contents than the control bread. Furthermore,the BPF-incorporated bread and the breads with theaddition of hydrocolloids did not alter the acceptability ratingsby the panellists. However, bread supplemented with CMC hadthe greatest acceptability ratings by the panellists.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
