Sir, The resurgence of protests in Thailand is not caused by any lack of understanding of democracy on the part of the middle classes, but from despair that democratic principles are under continuous attack. Would European electorates accept apparent control of their government from a convicted politician in self-imposed exile? Would they accept ministers of their government routinely travelling to meet that exile? Thais have shown remarkable restraint.
It seems that Thaksin Shinawatra has waged his proxy campaign to the detriment of Thailand’s stability and prosperity. The triggers for the recent protests were two bills. The first was a blanket amnesty, from which Mr Thaksin would have gained the most, including immunity for all past deeds and the return of his confiscated assets. This bill was turned down by the upper house, the Senate, which comprises elected and appointed members. Had it not been for the efforts of the protesters, this bill would have passed and the government would not have backed down. The Constitutional Court rejected the second bill, which would have weakened the check and balance provided by the Senate.
In submitting the bills and subsequently showing contempt for the court’s ruling, the government jeopardised its legitimacy in the eyes of precisely those who best understand the importance of democracy and the rule of law. Democracy cannot be blind to its abuse by those who would dismantle its checks and balances.
Success for Mr Thaksin in another general election would solve nothing. The ruling party continually emphasises its commitment to democracy, while using it unashamedly for the ambitions of one man. Mr Thaksin’s party’s campaign posters said it all: “Thaksin kit, Pheu Thai tam” – “What Thaksin wishes, the Pheu Thai party does.” His previous party was called “Thai rak Thai” – “Thais love Thais”. If Mr Thaksin feels this, his resignation from politics would be the best gift to Thailand.
Luqman Arnold and Atikrai Chatikavanij, Bangkok, Thailand