It is difficult to quarrel with the thrust of Enabling Law 15 of 4 March 2009: to bring the quality of public goods and services into line with international standards, making this both a strategic priority and a parameter for measuring progress and failures; to reward merit and punish incompetence and lack of commitment; consequently, to replace the bureaucratic culture with the culture of results and evaluation, of performance and performance measurement, of public service and citizens’ satisfaction; to restore the autonomy and accountability of executives, and to modulate their career on the basis of objectively measured results; to revise the criteria, parameters, mechanisms and procedures for the evaluation of collective and individual performance and the related systems of rewards and sanctions.