ComprehensiveAssessment andEvaluationof StudentsWithLearning
Disabilities
APaperPreparedby the
NationalJoint Committee onLearning Disabilities
June2010
The National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities (NJCLD)1
strongly supports comprehensive assessment and
evaluation of students with learning disabilities by a multidisciplinary team for the identification and diagnosis of
students with learning disabilities. Comprehensive assessment of individual students requires the use of multiple
data sources. These sources may include standardized tests, informal measures, observations, student self-reports,
parent reports, and progress monitoring data from response-to-intervention (RTI) approaches (NJCLD, 2005).
Reliance on any single criterion for assessment or evaluation is not comprehensive, nor is a group assessment, such
as universal screening or statewide academic assessment tests, sufficient for comprehensive assessment or
evaluation.
This paper is intended to inform administrators, educators, parents, and others concerned about the effective
identification and education of students with learning disabilities about the components, processes, and participants
necessary for comprehensive assessment and evaluation, as well as optimal practices that should further enhance
the education of students with learning disabilities. The NJCLD has long recognized that inappropriate assessment
and evaluation practices may result in questionable incidence rates for learning disabilities (NJCLD, 2001a).
Similarly, the NJCLD (2001a, 2001b) has provided a solid foundation for addressing the issues of assessment,
evaluation, identification, and eligibility of students with learning disabilities.
Differentiating Assessment and Evaluation