Pim wrote below there is a DOF report and a GFF Internal lab report but there is also a report from SGS for the 1st test report on 16 Oct before shipment.
1. At the request of Justine, can you arrange for a re-scan of the DOF test report and the GFF internal lab test report. Those are blurry.
2. Please forward the SGS reports for the 5 lots that GFF internal lab test was based on — attachment 2 according to Pim.
3. DoF
a) Please press DoF to tell us which of the 5 lots tested 110 MPN/g. It is very important. Julianne talked about — what if … what if SGS’s retest of the 5 retained samples are all clean. Now Orca Bay cannot ignore that DoF found contamination.
b) Does DoF still have the 5 samples they tested. Did they take those samples themselves or did NET send the samples to them. Can the bad sample be retested by an outside lab? If not, can the bad sample be retested by DoF. Then the sample can be tested specifically for “fecal E coli”.
So, in review — rescan 2 reports, send the first set of SGS results, and follow up several points with DoF.