Shortening the scale to meet the criteria in CFA resulted in significantly smaller number of items. In our opinion, short version of the scale, although psychometrically better than the long version, has somewhat less satisfying content validity. Some of the important and relevant indicators of FB users' experiences have been eliminated in CFA due to the lower factor loadings and in order to achieve better model fit. Thus, we decided to further analyze longer version of the questionnaire, having in mind that, even though it is less psychometrically sound, it has better content validity and can be very useful for the researchers who are interested to explore FB phenomena in more detail.