The settings for
programme delivery range across fixed locations
such as youth or community centres, faith-based
organizations or workplaces, and diverse, nonspecific
locations in the community. Their mode
of delivery varies from one-to-one counseling, to
group work to public and community-wide events.
Maticka-Tyndale and Brouillard-Coyle16 provide
an overview of the different types of communitybased
programmes and Maticka-Tyndale and
Barnett17 of peer-led interventions in their
systematic reviews. Meta-analyses and systematic
reviews of both school- and community-based
initiatives have produced best practice guidelines
based on the characteristics of programmes that
have been successful in shifting sexual behaviours
away from those that carry a high risk of HIV
transmission to those with lower risk14, 16, 17. This
leads to the conclusion that initiatives designed
and delivered in alignment with these best
practices can lower the vulnerability of school
going youth to HIV infection. However, successes
are limited in scope and size. Because of these
limitations, several researchers have recommended
combining school and community-based
programmes18, 19 to potentially increase their
impact.
This paper reports
The settings for
programme delivery range across fixed locations
such as youth or community centres, faith-based
organizations or workplaces, and diverse, nonspecific
locations in the community. Their mode
of delivery varies from one-to-one counseling, to
group work to public and community-wide events.
Maticka-Tyndale and Brouillard-Coyle16 provide
an overview of the different types of communitybased
programmes and Maticka-Tyndale and
Barnett17 of peer-led interventions in their
systematic reviews. Meta-analyses and systematic
reviews of both school- and community-based
initiatives have produced best practice guidelines
based on the characteristics of programmes that
have been successful in shifting sexual behaviours
away from those that carry a high risk of HIV
transmission to those with lower risk14, 16, 17. This
leads to the conclusion that initiatives designed
and delivered in alignment with these best
practices can lower the vulnerability of school
going youth to HIV infection. However, successes
are limited in scope and size. Because of these
limitations, several researchers have recommended
combining school and community-based
programmes18, 19 to potentially increase their
impact.
This paper reports
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..