Children’s anthropometric measures vary widely
across different age groups, within the same age groups,
between genders and between different cultures (Jeong
and Park, 1990). Children’s dimensions vary not only
between the different classes but also within the same
class. Thus, it is unlikely that school furniture with fixed
dimensions would be able to be compatible with the
majority of students. The need for adjustability in
school furniture, in order to accommodate the variation
in anthropometric measures is supported by the work of
Evans et al. (1988), Jeong and Park (1990) and Parcells
et al. (1999
Children’s anthropometric measures vary widelyacross different age groups, within the same age groups,between genders and between different cultures (Jeongand Park, 1990). Children’s dimensions vary not onlybetween the different classes but also within the sameclass. Thus, it is unlikely that school furniture with fixeddimensions would be able to be compatible with themajority of students. The need for adjustability inschool furniture, in order to accommodate the variationin anthropometric measures is supported by the work ofEvans et al. (1988), Jeong and Park (1990) and Parcellset al. (1999
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..