I examine portfolio risk management implications of using hypothetical investment returns from a sample
of mutual funds in a variety of investment objective classifications to select mutual funds. While early research
supported this practice by showing that risk is homogeneous within investment objective groups
and heterogeneous between groups, more recent research suggests that earlier findings are no longer true.
Research also suggests that load and no-load funds may exhibit risk differences. I examine whether risk is
homogeneous within investment classification and heterogeneous between classes after controlling for
potential load effects. Results reveal that significant risk differences exist even after controlling for the
load structure of the fund and that those risk differences can have significant implications for portfolio
risk management