Growth Performance
Overall (d 0 to 83), pigs fed the control diet, EESM,
or high CWG had greater (P < 0.05) ADG than pigs
fed EESM + 15% DDGS, whereas the ADG of pigs fed
DDGS + CWG and low CWG were not different from
ADG of pigs fed any other treatment diets (Table 6).
Pigs fed the control diet had greater (P < 0.05) ADFI
than pigs fed all other treatments. Pigs fed EESM and
DDGS + CWG had greater (P < 0.05) ADFI than
pigs fed EESM + 15% DDGS. Pigs fed either low or
high CWG had an ADFI that was not different (P >