In particular the younger, Holocene TL ages are therefore considered as maximum age estimates. For samples from older units, however, this effect is probably negligible given the proportionally larger errors, and thus likely does not significantly affect the validity of our Pleistocene TL chronology. The upper lake floor deposits (Unit 4) yielded TL ages of 5.5 ± 0.5 and 0.65 ± 0.08 ka in the embayment (P1, P18; Fig. 7). In
addition, a radiocarbon age of ~2.8 cal ka BP was obtained from plant remains associated with a flood sediment layer in Unit 4 on the distal terminal fan on the lake floor (P27, Fig. 7).
In particular the younger, Holocene TL ages are therefore considered as maximum age estimates. For samples from older units, however, this effect is probably negligible given the proportionally larger errors, and thus likely does not significantly affect the validity of our Pleistocene TL chronology. The upper lake floor deposits (Unit 4) yielded TL ages of 5.5 ± 0.5 and 0.65 ± 0.08 ka in the embayment (P1, P18; Fig. 7). Inaddition, a radiocarbon age of ~2.8 cal ka BP was obtained from plant remains associated with a flood sediment layer in Unit 4 on the distal terminal fan on the lake floor (P27, Fig. 7).
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
