outcomes. Methods: A total of 101 primiparas with the length of second stage of labor longer
mthaatne r2n ahl wanedre n seeolnecatteadl oauntdc opmreegs noafn ttw wo ogmroeunp ws iwthe rteh eo blesenrgvtehd l easnsd t hcoamn p2a hre sde. rRveeds ualst sc:o nAtr otol.t aTl hoef
62.1%(18/11) with the length of second stage of labor between 120 min and 180 min, 46.7%(28/32) tbheet wleenengt h18 o1f mseinc oanndd s2t4a0g em oinf laanbdo r1, 2t hloen lgoewr etrh asnco 2r4e1 o mf Ainp ugnadr esrcwaelen tf ovra gininfaanl tdse ilniv e1r ym. iTnh, ea nlodn gtheer hofi glhaebro rt hper oinlocnidgeedn,c eth oef ianscpihdyexnicae. sB ouft ctehsearree awna ss encot idoinf fearnedn coef pino sstcpaalretu imn 5h emmino.r rAhsa gsee cinoncrde astsaegde. Conclusions: Almost half of puerperas with the length of second stage of labor longer than 2 h
sucnadleer wine n1t mvaingi, nianlc dreealisvee rtyh.e T ihnec ipdreonlocne goefd assepchoynxdi as,t abguet ohfa lsa bnoor ecfafnec dt eocnre sacsael eth ien s 5c omrei no.f IAt psgtialrl onfe eladb omro.re evidence