Table 4 reports the results from this analysis. These results
indicate that the gender of the person with the primary
responsibility of attending meetings does not significantly affect
the probability that the household will perceive the rules or
penalties as fair. More important determinants include: the
percent of households in the village that have been excluded
because of fees, the distance to a city center (rural households
think rules are less fair than more urban households), socioeconomic
conditions, whether the household views the forest as an
economic resource or not, and the country the household is located
in. Overall, however, the results from Table 4 indicate that the
gender of the person from the household with the primary
responsibility for attending meetings does not lead to the
perception that the FUG rules or penalties are more or less fair.
Table 4 reports the results from this analysis. These resultsindicate that the gender of the person with the primaryresponsibility of attending meetings does not significantly affectthe probability that the household will perceive the rules orpenalties as fair. More important determinants include: thepercent of households in the village that have been excludedbecause of fees, the distance to a city center (rural householdsthink rules are less fair than more urban households), socioeconomicconditions, whether the household views the forest as aneconomic resource or not, and the country the household is locatedin. Overall, however, the results from Table 4 indicate that thegender of the person from the household with the primaryresponsibility for attending meetings does not lead to theperception that the FUG rules or penalties are more or less fair.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
