Koyote SwayIt is amazing to look de

Koyote Sway
It is amazing to look deeply into the eyes of a passerby . . . and see 'the knowing', where, just the day before, all you saw was 'the nothing'. Those that fight it are going to have the greatest struggle. Change is hard fought for, in our kind, it is our nature. Those that ignore it, just love them, hold them and prop them up . . . . and for some, just let them think it was there very own discovery, lol. We are Love, We are Peace, We are One . . . We are Coming, Namaste'
8 months ago•3

TheThansen669
Again, eleven dimensions not three. Ego is simply an aspect of personality. I am not a slave not my ego as I am no ego-centric, though I am a little cocky. The is no 'real person' larger than the physical person in any provable way, any leanings in that direction are matters of faith not logic. They are insubstatiable, unprovable, and therefore irrelevant beyond what they mean to a person. I did not say the 'idea of reason' anything, I said a reasoned idea. I never referred to reason having a purpose. If I were to define the purpose of reason it is rationally observe the universe for the purpose of understanding what is provably real. You claimed to have experienced the divine, a higher consciousness? Who am I to say? Bet you haven't though, bet you wanted to and convinced yourself you did. Either way, if you did experience something, then that something is rationally part of the universe that we have yet to understand. If its real, it will be eventually understood rationally. I would put Vegas odds you haven't experienced squat. A blind man knows that there are things to be seen despite his inability to do so. He knows the because he knows that blindness affects a minority and the majority see. He hears from every sighted person that these things are. I say my heart is my own business because what I feel is far less substantial than what I know or do. You give massive import to my ego, ego being my sense of self worth. You claim my self worth deludes me from knowing a higher larger version of myself that cannot be defined. In essence, you are saying if I considered myself without worth then I could truly become some great....thing. This is the kind of justification given to suicide bombers. I'd rather know as much as there is to know in this life. It seems dramatically more practical.
1 month ago•

yubbone
+TheThansen669 I can't speak to your ego, as the ego can only defend itself for fear of its compromise & unraveling. The real you has come to believe that the body its in, the mind it is enslaved to, & this 3D realm, is all there is. You believe an idea of reason may exist beyond any witness, yet you also contend that a reason holds innate purpose. Purpose from whom? Your stances contradict eachother, and that's because the true you understands what your mind attempts to drown out with its focus on the petty & temporal. You claim that people that experience things you yourself admit to having no remembered firsthand knowledge of are lying, & that they are committed to fantasy. There is no "reason" in such arrogant foolishness. Again, this is your ego attempting to burn off that which it isn't aligned with, and then justifies itself under the guile of "reason." The things you want to be "demonstrated" as true are things that cannot be put to paper. A blind man asks someone about the sunset, to describe its beauty. The someone tells the blind man "I cannot convey that to you in the ways that you can perceive." The blind man then tells the someone that he is a liar, that there is no sun, and that if there were, he would know it. This is how you act, only your blindness is by choice. You say your heart is your own business. Be aware that there are many that directly perceive your state of heart regardless of your unwillingness to show it, through only a glance at your body, through only a statement of your mind. That is why I say these things to you. I have a feeling your ego will continue tending walls towards all I've just said, but I felt a need to say them, as they are the truth that my soul knows. I hope you come to know these things in your next life. Good bye
1 month ago•1

TheThansen669
Yes, it is criticism and yes I am correct. You can respond and feel any way you choose. Reason as a concept is a concept. A reasoned idea exists independently of the moment it was conceived and of the physical brain that conceived it. All moments in time are absolute because they are they foundation of the next moment. If this were not so the universe would be chaotic and random, instead of governed by unbreakable laws like gravity and the speed of light. The purpose of reason is to take known quantities in order to correctly identify other known quantities. Anything correctly reasoned is also proved, and therefore is. This is the basis of all scientific reasoning, all physics, mechanics, engineering, medicine, psychotherapy, everything that is the modern sane world. There are eleven known dimensions that comprise the universe and the human being perceives that universe with 23 known senses. I don't care if parts of myself exist in some multiverse or other fantasy construct. I don't perceive those other parts and no one else does either that isn't lying. A horse wearing blinders has not forgotten left or right, because they can turn left and right. Society is not monolithic, there are many aspects of many societies that have many values that they impart. The things you say that human beings are more than, you are simply making up. You believe it as a tenant of faith, which is fine but you cannot demonstrate in any way as true. I read everything with my eyes. My heart is my own business.
1 month ago•

Koyote Sway
+yubbone Very well said . . . God Is, I Am, We Are . . . eternal beings. Peace
1 month ago•

yubbone
+TheThansen669 You should be smart enough to know that communication is half in what you say, and half in how you say it. Positively-intended criticism is a good thing, but when even the same critiques come from a place of seeming superiority, "only fools believe this, HOW could you not think as I", then "tough love" be damned as most people will not favorably respond to that, right or wrong. If you really feel you have a message that can help, then it'd be in everyone's best interest if you learned how to convey it in a way conducive to that intent. But this is the secondary issue. You claim that reason exists in the "essence" of that which is reasoned. But reason itself, is a concept, and concepts require a mind-body awareness to perceive. Therefore it cannot stand as independent, and certainly not as infinite unless that which perceives it imbues it with an infinity of its own (which is actually the case). Flatness and rational identification never not being so is a stagnant representation of an organic system of time that never stops moving. The only place that moment will always be that moment, is in the mind, the memory, of an observer. And herein lies the main chord. You believe that awareness does not exist without the mind-body, yet correct me if I'm wrong, but your beliefs also seem to indicate you believe in multiple dimensions beyond 2D, 3D? If so, why would the possibility of the totality of your being housing across multiple dimensions simultaneously, be unacceptable? If that is the case, if you exist in many such dimensions whose borders & relationships defy lingual definition yet are all connected, then how impossible a notion would it be to entertain that your mind & body are simply the tools through which your greater, total being experiences this 3D realm? A total being whose aspects infinitely exceed the constraints of the temporal, 3D animal, but whose funneling of consciousness through said animal traditionally conditions that tentacle of infinity to forget its true nature, as the horse wearing blinders forgets the existence of left or right until its entire body is made to turn. Our society conditions us into believing that we are simply a mind and body, purely happenstance and wholly animal, when the truth of what we are is infinitely beyond this, and many have perceived this, though still many have not. If you open to this truth then you will understand what I am saying when I speak of oneness and the like, and how it in no way diminishes, but rather utterly empowers while placing into perspective the individual. I don't know what your definition of the word "mystics" is, nor do I identify with that word; to define oneself is to confine oneself. I've written you quite a bit. I hope you read it with your heart.
1 month ago•

TheThansen669
Oh boy. Ok. We need to get one thing clear, I am criticizing ideas, not criticizing people. Maybe you are unable to distinguish this, maybe the only way you can discount what I'm saying it to say I'm saying it to be mean. I'm not insecure, disconnected from myself and am completely at peace. I could list the many reasons why but honestly...who cares why I am those things. You ask a great question though and I am very happy to answer. Reason exists in the the essence of that which is reasoned. If I say look at your bicycle and say 'the front tire is flat', in that moment the tire will never not be flat. You may fix the flat later but that is later, that moment of flatness and its rational identification as such are never not so. Put more simply by Descartes, Cogito Ergo Sum, I think therefore I am. Awareness does not exist outside of the 'human shell', you cannot be aware of anything without the means to do so. Observation requires an observer. All are not one, all are all. One is not all or nothing, one is one. These words have specific meaning. I am not being mystical or deep by saying I hear with my eyes and see with my toes. I am intentionally confusion the meanings of these words to create nonsense ideas. There is no mystical 'master mind' machinery to which we are

ผลลัพธ์ (ไทย) 1:

กทาง Koyoteน่าแปลกใจที่จะมองลึกเข้าไปในสายตาของ passerby... และดู 'การรู้' ที่ วันก่อน ทั้งหมดเพียงคุณเห็นถูก 'มีอะไร' ที่ต่อสู้นั้นจะมีการต่อสู้มากที่สุด เปลี่ยนแปลงยากที่จะสู้ในชนิดของเรา มันเป็นธรรมชาติของเรา ผู้ที่ละเว้น เพียงรักพวกเขา พวกเขา ค้างไว้รองรับพวกเขา... และสำหรับบางคน พวกเขาคิดว่า มันเป็นมีการค้นพบตัวเองมาก ฮ่า ๆ เรามีความรัก เรามีความสงบ เราเป็นหนึ่ง... เราจะมา นามัส 'ago•3 8 เดือนTheThansen669Again, eleven dimensions not three. Ego is simply an aspect of personality. I am not a slave not my ego as I am no ego-centric, though I am a little cocky. The is no 'real person' larger than the physical person in any provable way, any leanings in that direction are matters of faith not logic. They are insubstatiable, unprovable, and therefore irrelevant beyond what they mean to a person. I did not say the 'idea of reason' anything, I said a reasoned idea. I never referred to reason having a purpose. If I were to define the purpose of reason it is rationally observe the universe for the purpose of understanding what is provably real. You claimed to have experienced the divine, a higher consciousness? Who am I to say? Bet you haven't though, bet you wanted to and convinced yourself you did. Either way, if you did experience something, then that something is rationally part of the universe that we have yet to understand. If its real, it will be eventually understood rationally. I would put Vegas odds you haven't experienced squat. A blind man knows that there are things to be seen despite his inability to do so. He knows the because he knows that blindness affects a minority and the majority see. He hears from every sighted person that these things are. I say my heart is my own business because what I feel is far less substantial than what I know or do. You give massive import to my ego, ego being my sense of self worth. You claim my self worth deludes me from knowing a higher larger version of myself that cannot be defined. In essence, you are saying if I considered myself without worth then I could truly become some great....thing. This is the kind of justification given to suicide bombers. I'd rather know as much as there is to know in this life. It seems dramatically more practical. 1 month ago•yubbone+TheThansen669 I can't speak to your ego, as the ego can only defend itself for fear of its compromise & unraveling. The real you has come to believe that the body its in, the mind it is enslaved to, & this 3D realm, is all there is. You believe an idea of reason may exist beyond any witness, yet you also contend that a reason holds innate purpose. Purpose from whom? Your stances contradict eachother, and that's because the true you understands what your mind attempts to drown out with its focus on the petty & temporal. You claim that people that experience things you yourself admit to having no remembered firsthand knowledge of are lying, & that they are committed to fantasy. There is no "reason" in such arrogant foolishness. Again, this is your ego attempting to burn off that which it isn't aligned with, and then justifies itself under the guile of "reason." The things you want to be "demonstrated" as true are things that cannot be put to paper. A blind man asks someone about the sunset, to describe its beauty. The someone tells the blind man "I cannot convey that to you in the ways that you can perceive." The blind man then tells the someone that he is a liar, that there is no sun, and that if there were, he would know it. This is how you act, only your blindness is by choice. You say your heart is your own business. Be aware that there are many that directly perceive your state of heart regardless of your unwillingness to show it, through only a glance at your body, through only a statement of your mind. That is why I say these things to you. I have a feeling your ego will continue tending walls towards all I've just said, but I felt a need to say them, as they are the truth that my soul knows. I hope you come to know these things in your next life. Good bye1 month ago•1

TheThansen669
Yes, it is criticism and yes I am correct. You can respond and feel any way you choose. Reason as a concept is a concept. A reasoned idea exists independently of the moment it was conceived and of the physical brain that conceived it. All moments in time are absolute because they are they foundation of the next moment. If this were not so the universe would be chaotic and random, instead of governed by unbreakable laws like gravity and the speed of light. The purpose of reason is to take known quantities in order to correctly identify other known quantities. Anything correctly reasoned is also proved, and therefore is. This is the basis of all scientific reasoning, all physics, mechanics, engineering, medicine, psychotherapy, everything that is the modern sane world. There are eleven known dimensions that comprise the universe and the human being perceives that universe with 23 known senses. I don't care if parts of myself exist in some multiverse or other fantasy construct. I don't perceive those other parts and no one else does either that isn't lying. A horse wearing blinders has not forgotten left or right, because they can turn left and right. Society is not monolithic, there are many aspects of many societies that have many values that they impart. The things you say that human beings are more than, you are simply making up. You believe it as a tenant of faith, which is fine but you cannot demonstrate in any way as true. I read everything with my eyes. My heart is my own business.
1 month ago•

Koyote Sway
+yubbone Very well said . . . God Is, I Am, We Are . . . eternal beings. Peace
1 month ago•

yubbone
+TheThansen669 You should be smart enough to know that communication is half in what you say, and half in how you say it. Positively-intended criticism is a good thing, but when even the same critiques come from a place of seeming superiority, "only fools believe this, HOW could you not think as I", then "tough love" be damned as most people will not favorably respond to that, right or wrong. If you really feel you have a message that can help, then it'd be in everyone's best interest if you learned how to convey it in a way conducive to that intent. But this is the secondary issue. You claim that reason exists in the "essence" of that which is reasoned. But reason itself, is a concept, and concepts require a mind-body awareness to perceive. Therefore it cannot stand as independent, and certainly not as infinite unless that which perceives it imbues it with an infinity of its own (which is actually the case). Flatness and rational identification never not being so is a stagnant representation of an organic system of time that never stops moving. The only place that moment will always be that moment, is in the mind, the memory, of an observer. And herein lies the main chord. You believe that awareness does not exist without the mind-body, yet correct me if I'm wrong, but your beliefs also seem to indicate you believe in multiple dimensions beyond 2D, 3D? If so, why would the possibility of the totality of your being housing across multiple dimensions simultaneously, be unacceptable? If that is the case, if you exist in many such dimensions whose borders & relationships defy lingual definition yet are all connected, then how impossible a notion would it be to entertain that your mind & body are simply the tools through which your greater, total being experiences this 3D realm? A total being whose aspects infinitely exceed the constraints of the temporal, 3D animal, but whose funneling of consciousness through said animal traditionally conditions that tentacle of infinity to forget its true nature, as the horse wearing blinders forgets the existence of left or right until its entire body is made to turn. Our society conditions us into believing that we are simply a mind and body, purely happenstance and wholly animal, when the truth of what we are is infinitely beyond this, and many have perceived this, though still many have not. If you open to this truth then you will understand what I am saying when I speak of oneness and the like, and how it in no way diminishes, but rather utterly empowers while placing into perspective the individual. I don't know what your definition of the word "mystics" is, nor do I identify with that word; to define oneself is to confine oneself. I've written you quite a bit. I hope you read it with your heart.
1 month ago•

TheThansen669
Oh boy. Ok. We need to get one thing clear, I am criticizing ideas, not criticizing people. Maybe you are unable to distinguish this, maybe the only way you can discount what I'm saying it to say I'm saying it to be mean. I'm not insecure, disconnected from myself and am completely at peace. I could list the many reasons why but honestly...who cares why I am those things. You ask a great question though and I am very happy to answer. Reason exists in the the essence of that which is reasoned. If I say look at your bicycle and say 'the front tire is flat', in that moment the tire will never not be flat. You may fix the flat later but that is later, that moment of flatness and its rational identification as such are never not so. Put more simply by Descartes, Cogito Ergo Sum, I think therefore I am. Awareness does not exist outside of the 'human shell', you cannot be aware of anything without the means to do so. Observation requires an observer. All are not one, all are all. One is not all or nothing, one is one. These words have specific meaning. I am not being mystical or deep by saying I hear with my eyes and see with my toes. I am intentionally confusion the meanings of these words to create nonsense ideas. There is no mystical 'master mind' machinery to which we are

ผลลัพธ์ (ไทย) 3:

โคโยตี้โยก
มันวิเศษที่จะมองลึกเข้าไปในดวงตาของคนผ่านไปมา . . . . . . . และดู ' รู้ ' ว่า แค่ วัน ก่อน ทั้งหมดที่คุณเห็นคือ ' ไม่มีอะไร ' ผู้ต่อสู้จะต้องมีการต่อสู้ที่ยิ่งใหญ่ที่สุด การเปลี่ยนแปลงเป็นเรื่องยากสำหรับการต่อสู้ในลักษณะของเรา มันเป็นธรรมชาติของเรา ผู้ที่ไม่สนใจ เพียงแค่รักพวกเขา จับพวกเขาและสนับสนุนพวกเขาขึ้น . . . . . . . และสำหรับบางคนปล่อยให้พวกเขาคิดว่ามันอยู่ตรงนั้นเอง การค้นพบ ฮ่าๆๆๆๆ เราชอบ เราสงบ เราเป็นหนึ่งใน . . . . . . . เรามา นมัสเต '
8 เดือน - 3

thethansen669
อีกสิบเอ็ดมิติไม่สาม อัตตาเป็นเพียงลักษณะของบุคลิกภาพ ข้าไม่ใช่ทาส ไม่ใช่อัตตาของฉันเป็นฉันไม่อีโก้เป็นศูนย์กลาง แต่ผมมั่นใจนิดหน่อย ไม่มี ' คนจริง ' ใหญ่กว่าบุคคลทางกายภาพใด ๆที่พิสูจน์ได้ทางใด ๆในที่โอนเอียงทิศทางเรื่องของความเชื่อ ไม่ใช่ตรรกะ พวกเขาจะ insubstatiable unprovable , และดังนั้นจึงไม่เกี่ยวข้องนอกเหนือจากสิ่งที่พวกเขาหมายถึงคน ผมไม่ได้บอกว่าความคิดเหตุผลอะไรก็ได้ ผมบอกเหตุผลความคิด ผมไม่เรียกว่าเหตุผลมีจุดประสงค์ถ้าผมจะกำหนดวัตถุประสงค์ของเหตุผลก็คือเหตุผลสังเกตจักรวาลเพื่อความเข้าใจสิ่งที่อาจจริง คุณอ้างว่าได้พบพระเจ้าที่จิตสำนึกมากกว่า ที่ผมจะพูด เดิมพันที่คุณยังไม่ได้ แต่ เดิมพัน คุณต้องการ และตัวคุณเอง คุณทำ ทั้งสองวิธีถ้าคุณพบบางอย่างแล้วอะไรคือเหตุผลส่วนหนึ่งของจักรวาลที่ยังเข้าใจ ถ้ามันจริง มันจะในที่สุดก็เข้าใจเหตุผล ผมจะใส่สเวกัสราคาต่อรองที่คุณไม่ได้มีประสบการณ์อะไรทั้งสิ้น คนตาบอดรู้ว่ามีสิ่งที่จะมองเห็นได้แม้จะมีการไร้ความสามารถของเขาที่จะทำเช่นนั้น เขารู้ เพราะเขารู้ว่าตาบอดต่อชนกลุ่มน้อยและส่วนใหญ่เห็นเขาได้ยินจากทุกสายตาคนพวกนี้ . ฉันพูดว่าหัวใจของฉันเอง ธุรกิจ เพราะสิ่งที่ผมรู้สึกอยู่ไกลมากน้อยกว่าสิ่งที่ผมรู้ หรือทำ คุณให้มากเข้า อัตตาของเรา อัตตาถูกความรู้สึกคุ้มค่าด้วยตนเอง คุณเรียกร้องค่าของฉันเอง deludes ผมรู้ที่สูงใหญ่กว่ารุ่นของตัวเองที่ไม่สามารถกำหนด ในสาระ