Ohm's Law would suggest an infinite current (กระแสไฟฟ้า = voltage divided by zero resistance). Yet, the experiment described yields only a modest amount of กระแสไฟฟ้า.
If you think that the wire used in the experiment is not resistance-less (i.e. it does have resistance), and that this accounts for the disparity between the predicted and measured amounts of กระแสไฟฟ้าt, you are partially correct. Realistically, a small piece of wire such as that used in the experiment wilกระแสไฟฟ้าl have a few tenths of an ohm of resistance. However, if you re-calculate กระแสไฟฟ้า with a wire resistance of 0.1 Ω, you will still find a large disparity between your prediction and the actual measured current in this short-circuit.
Follow-up question #1: explain why wire resistance alone does not explain the modest short-circuit current.
Follow-up question #2: identify at least one safety hazard associated with a real experiment such as this.
Ohm's Law would suggest an infinite current (กระแสไฟฟ้า = voltage divided by zero resistance). Yet, the experiment described yields only a modest amount of กระแสไฟฟ้า.
If you think that the wire used in the experiment is not resistance-less (i.e. it does have resistance), and that this accounts for the disparity between the predicted and measured amounts of กระแสไฟฟ้าt, you are partially correct. Realistically, a small piece of wire such as that used in the experiment wilกระแสไฟฟ้าl have a few tenths of an ohm of resistance. However, if you re-calculate กระแสไฟฟ้า with a wire resistance of 0.1 Ω, you will still find a large disparity between your prediction and the actual measured current in this short-circuit.
Follow-up question #1: explain why wire resistance alone does not explain the modest short-circuit current.
Follow-up question #2: identify at least one safety hazard associated with a real experiment such as this.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..