Carcass data is presented in Table 5. The interaction of treatment ×plant and treatment × slaughter date was not significant (P ≥ 0.16) and was removed from the statistical analysis. Hot carcass weight, dressing percent, fat thickness, or LM area did not differ between SβC1X and RP (P ≥ 0.67) and did not differ because of amount of βC (P ≥ 0.18). Kidney, pelvic, heart fat, yield grade, marbling score, and LM ether extract did not differ between SβC1X and RP (P ≥ 0.19) and were not affected by theamount of βC (P≥ 0.13). Choice grade distribution did not differ between SβC1X and RP (P ≥ 0.22), but SβC tended (P = 0.07) to have a quadratic effect on the percent of carcasses grading low choice, decreasing from SβC1X to SβC5X and increasing from SβC5X to SβC10X. No noticeable liver abscesses were present and
liver weight did not differ due to amount of βC (P ≥ 0.32) and did not
differ between SβC1X and RP (P ≥ 0.13).
Color data is presented in Table 6. Lightness (L*), redness (a*), and
Carcass data is presented in Table 5. The interaction of treatment ×plant and treatment × slaughter date was not significant (P ≥ 0.16) and was removed from the statistical analysis. Hot carcass weight, dressing percent, fat thickness, or LM area did not differ between SβC1X and RP (P ≥ 0.67) and did not differ because of amount of βC (P ≥ 0.18). Kidney, pelvic, heart fat, yield grade, marbling score, and LM ether extract did not differ between SβC1X and RP (P ≥ 0.19) and were not affected by theamount of βC (P≥ 0.13). Choice grade distribution did not differ between SβC1X and RP (P ≥ 0.22), but SβC tended (P = 0.07) to have a quadratic effect on the percent of carcasses grading low choice, decreasing from SβC1X to SβC5X and increasing from SβC5X to SβC10X. No noticeable liver abscesses were present andliver weight did not differ due to amount of βC (P ≥ 0.32) and did notdiffer between SβC1X and RP (P ≥ 0.13).Color data is presented in Table 6. Lightness (L*), redness (a*), and
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..