This paper sketches out an agenda for reconciling informal and formal institutions and procedures
of urban land management in developing countries. It starts from the proposition that the
de"cits of the formal system can be partially overcome by a stepwise integration of the actors,
institutions and procedures which are being deployed in informal or socially regulated local
decision making for housing land supply, security of tenure rights, lay-out regulation and land
servicing. This assumption corresponds with the new perception of informal or socially regulated
land management in the international planning literature and by governments. Initially, the
attitude and response of national governments toward the self-initiative of urban low-income
households consisted of active hostility or benign neglect (Zaghloul, 1994) and government
measures ranged from passing tough, stringent regulations to exclude such settlements from any
infrastructure extension plans to outright demolition (Cheema, 1993)
This paper sketches out an agenda for reconciling informal and formal institutions and procedures
of urban land management in developing countries. It starts from the proposition that the
de"cits of the formal system can be partially overcome by a stepwise integration of the actors,
institutions and procedures which are being deployed in informal or socially regulated local
decision making for housing land supply, security of tenure rights, lay-out regulation and land
servicing. This assumption corresponds with the new perception of informal or socially regulated
land management in the international planning literature and by governments. Initially, the
attitude and response of national governments toward the self-initiative of urban low-income
households consisted of active hostility or benign neglect (Zaghloul, 1994) and government
measures ranged from passing tough, stringent regulations to exclude such settlements from any
infrastructure extension plans to outright demolition (Cheema, 1993)
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..