The evaluation of our proposal was uniformly very positive. As shown in Table 2, all evaluations were above 4 (range 1–5) in questions Q1–Q17, and above 9 (range 1–10) in questions Q19–Q20. In general the results did not show considerable deviations between groups (students and professors). We only found significant differences in questions Q7, Q18 and Q19. In Q7, we observed that students are more willing to recommend our proposed tool to others. Q18 and Q19, on the other hand, directly compare our solution with other methods of learning anatomy. Both groups favored our proposal, but the evaluations of the students were again significantly higher.