A plot study showed that the app-based schedules were similar to that of an on-site ET controller. Significant differences (water savings) were observed between the ET controllers and the app as compared to that of a time-based schedule. Water savings using the app was 48% as compared to the time-based schedule. While the app treatment total irrigation depth was greater during wet season than the ET controller 1 treatment depth, if the seasonal water savings option had been used there would have been a 51 mm reduction in irrigation applied.