Although Pouyaud et al. (2003) mention the original description of S. formosus in the references, no details of
morphometric or meristic measurements, description of the colouration or comments on the original colour plate
are given. Therefore, the designation of a neotype for S. formosus by Pouyaud et al. (2003) does not meet the
requirements of the Code. More important, and missed by Pouyaud et al. (2003), the designation of a neotype is
unnecessary because the types are still extant.