Observed final leaf number
in the intermittent treatments did not span as wide a range
as the continuous treatments (Figs 4 and 5). However, the
scatter of the data for the intermittent treatments around
the 1:1 line was no worse than for the continuous data,
suggesting that the model is prediciting consistently across
continuous and intermittent vernalization treatments. The
exception was in cv. Mit which had significantly higher
scatter between 14 and 17 leaves. However, paired t-tests
between observed and predicted final leaf numbers at each
temperature failed to reveal that there was a significant
difference for either continuous or intermittent treatments.
Across continuous and intermittent treatments, the model
explained 82, 81, 69, 80, and 74 % of the observed variation
in final leaf number on the main shoot for cvs. Agent, Mit,
Nugaines, Burt, and Scout 66, respectively
Observed final leaf numberin the intermittent treatments did not span as wide a rangeas the continuous treatments (Figs 4 and 5). However, thescatter of the data for the intermittent treatments aroundthe 1:1 line was no worse than for the continuous data,suggesting that the model is prediciting consistently acrosscontinuous and intermittent vernalization treatments. Theexception was in cv. Mit which had significantly higherscatter between 14 and 17 leaves. However, paired t-testsbetween observed and predicted final leaf numbers at eachtemperature failed to reveal that there was a significantdifference for either continuous or intermittent treatments.Across continuous and intermittent treatments, the modelexplained 82, 81, 69, 80, and 74 % of the observed variationin final leaf number on the main shoot for cvs. Agent, Mit,Nugaines, Burt, and Scout 66, respectively
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
