The meeting of GSB Transaction Code was done please my summary as following:
1) EY Present their selected trans_code in group of LN and COM with the information of percentage and number of record of data that related to trans_code by data from GSB (31.01.2015)
2) The concept of trans_code of EY are base on the existing transaction in data that they got from GSB.
3) GSB have the suggestion about EY concept, because in some trans_code are still not have transaction yet but not mean that trans_code are cancelled, from this suggestions we have to selected the trans_code one by one from LN, COM even they don't have transaction yet.
4) EY & us go through the trans_code one by one by asking this trans_code is required or not and both of us defending the ideas, the summarize of idea for trans_code are following:
4.1) not FEE transactions
4.2) not TAX transactions
4.3) not Paid transactions (by GSB or Others)
4.4) not Reversal transactions
4.5) not Adjustment transactions
4.6) Other transactions not related to customer payment (it's case by case because in some trans_code not clearly information, EY will mark it in need more info and send to GSB)
5) From No.4, GSB required us to send them the concept of trans_code selection (paper)
6) We just finished for group of LN only for COM not yet, due to more attendee have other task, then for COM trans_code EY will doing it same with LN and send to GSB.
7) GSB confirmed the group of RC not required
The document from EY will completed by tomorrow and will submit to us first, GSB said that they will not confirm the result only review and give back to us, in case of question or un-sure we (EY) can put the remark in each trans_code.
The MOM of the meeting will produce and complete by tomorrow (19.11.2015) and I will reviewing before submit to GSB.
Any comments or concerns please let me know.
The meeting of GSB Transaction Code was done please my summary as following: 1) EY Present their selected trans_code in group of LN and COM with the information of percentage and number of record of data that related to trans_code by data from GSB (31.01.2015) 2) The concept of trans_code of EY are base on the existing transaction in data that they got from GSB. 3) GSB have the suggestion about EY concept, because in some trans_code are still not have transaction yet but not mean that trans_code are cancelled, from this suggestions we have to selected the trans_code one by one from LN, COM even they don't have transaction yet. 4) EY & us go through the trans_code one by one by asking this trans_code is required or not and both of us defending the ideas, the summarize of idea for trans_code are following: 4.1) not FEE transactions 4.2) not TAX transactions 4.3) not Paid transactions (by GSB or Others) 4.4) not Reversal transactions 4.5) not Adjustment transactions 4.6) Other transactions not related to customer payment (it's case by case because in some trans_code not clearly information, EY will mark it in need more info and send to GSB) 5) From No.4, GSB required us to send them the concept of trans_code selection (paper) 6) We just finished for group of LN only for COM not yet, due to more attendee have other task, then for COM trans_code EY will doing it same with LN and send to GSB. 7) GSB confirmed the group of RC not required The document from EY will completed by tomorrow and will submit to us first, GSB said that they will not confirm the result only review and give back to us, in case of question or un-sure we (EY) can put the remark in each trans_code. The MOM of the meeting will produce and complete by tomorrow (19.11.2015) and I will reviewing before submit to GSB. Any comments or concerns please let me know.
การแปล กรุณารอสักครู่..
